In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Preußische Akademie der Künste >> 12. Stiftungen >> 12.4. Persönliche Stiftungen
1930 - 1932
Enthält: - Korrespondenz mit der Preußischen Staatsbank (Seehandlung) zur Verwaltung der Wertpapiere. - Gewährung von Beihilfen an die Meisterschüler Rudolf Hinderer (Bl. 37f.), Emy Köcke-Potthoff (Bl. 36, 39f., 126-128, 159, 190-193) mit Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 128, 192); Fritz Mayer (Bl. 241-246) mit Befürwortung von Karl Plontke (Bl. 246); Hugo Peschel (Bl. 43f.), Hans-Christian Plath (Bl. 81-83, 103-105) mit Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 83); Florenz Robert Schabbon (Bl. 143f.), August Tölken (Bl. 237-240) mit Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 239). - Gewährung von Beihilfen an jüngere Künstler: die Maler Fritz Bersch (Bl. 54-57) mit Befürwortung von Ludwig Manzel (Bl. 57); Gertrud Breuer-Weckwerth (Bl. 217-219, Franz Danksin (Bl. 194f.); Fritz Duda (Bl. 9-13, Befürwortung von Plontke), Ilse Fischer (Bl. 22, 28-31, 254-258, Befürwortung von Max Kautzsch, Bl. 258), H. A. Franke (Bl. 6-8), Otto Freytag (Bl. 162-164), Erwin Graumann (Bl. 32-35, 94-97) mit Empfehlung von Karl Hofer (Bl. 35); Georg Hengstenberg (Bl. 114), Fritz Hullmann (Bl. 91-93) mit Befürwortung von Hans Meid, Bl. 93), Edgar Jené (Bl. 173-178, Ludwig Alfred Jonas (Bl. 138f., 199) Jürgen Kallmann (Bl. 2f., 27, 50, 80, 179-183) mit Befürwortung von Max Slevogt (Bl. 181); Mendel [Mindel, Bl. 140] mit Befürwortung von Karl Hofer (Bl. 141); Artur Meyer (Bl. 23-26, 129-131) mit Befürwortung von Karl Hofer (Bl. 26, 131); Hans Meyboden (Bl. 84-87, 136), Ewald Meyer (Bl. 49, 125, 154, 201), Erich Nagel (Bl. 45f., 148-151, 196-198) mit Befürwortung von Karl Hofer (Bl. 46, 198); Ernst Wilhelm Nay (Bl. 189, 266), Wilhelm Philipp (Bl. 18-20, 155-158), Antonie Pigur (Bl. 1, 52f.) mit Befürwortung von Käthe Kollwitz (Bl. 53); Curt Rothe (Bl. 21, 137), Fritz Schneider (Bl. 212-216, Walter Simsch (Bl. 4f., Erich Waske (Bl. 209-211), - an die Graphiker Hugo Peschel (Bl. 14-17), Elisabeth Voigt (Bl. 145-147, 183f., 206) mit Befürwortung von Käthe Kollwitz (Bl. 184); - an die Bildhauer Hermann Blumenthal (Bl. 48, 62f.), Hellmut Drollinger (Bl. 249) Erich Geiseler (Bl. 152f.), Georg Koch (Bl. 188, 220, 233-236), Hans Mettel (Bl. 41f., 224, 250-253, Schreiben von Amersdorffer Bl. 251), Martin Müller (Bl. 264-266), Kurt Radtke (Bl. 259-261) mit Befürwortung von Hugo Lederer (Bl. 261); Michael Schoberth (Bl. 58-61) mit Befürwortung von Edwin Scharff; Christian Theunert (Bl. 88-90, 117-119, 135, 168-171, 202-205), - an den Architekten Josef John Förste (Bl. 102, 106); - Darlehen an Priebe-Bosani (Bl. 165, 172); - an die Professoren Christoph Voll (Bl. 207), Heinrich Altherr (Bl. 208).
280 Bl. Microfilm/-fiche: 1383
Archivale
Beschriftung: Registratursignatur: Reg. IV - W 3 - Bd. 2
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
