Kritiken "Am Rande"
Show full title
N 116 Rottendorf; Ennigerloh, 100
N 116 Rottendorf; Ennigerloh Rottendorf; Ennigerloh
Rottendorf; Ennigerloh >> 09 Kritiken
1959 - 1961
Enthält u.a.: - "Am Rande": - Inhaltsverzeichnis - Privatzuschriften - Kritik von Dr. Rolf Lappe, 22.12.1959 - Antwortschreiben an Dr. Rolf Lappe von Andreas J. Rottendorf, 11.02.1960 - Kritik von Heinrich Luhmann, 23.05.1960 - Antwortschreiben an Herrn Luhmann, 31.05.1960 - Kritik von: Dr. Fritz Eichhorn (23.05.1960), Dr. Fred Mayer (23.05.1960), Wilhelm Peters (30.05.1960) - Drei Abschriften von der Kritik "Am Rande" von Heinrich Luhmann - Kritik von Gregor Schwake (31.05.1960) - Dankschreiben für die Zusendung des Buches "Am Rande": Pastor Tembrink (19.05.1960), Heinrich Tenhumberg (18.05.1960), Ewald Kipper (18.05.1960) - Kritik: Westfälischer Arbeitgeberverband für die chemische Industrie (25.05.1960), Heinrich Luhmann (29.05.1960), Carl Gildemeister (09.06.1960), Pater Baumann (20.06.1960), K. Remmers (30.06.1960) - "Aus Brief von Mlle Letcher", 27.06.1960 - Brief von Heinrich Windelen, 23.09.1960 - Dankschreiben für die Zusendung von "Am Rande": Dr. Josef Forck (26.09.1960) - Kritik: Helmut Kern (08.10.1960), Der Bundesminister für Wirtschaft (23.11.1960), F. Dalichow (20.10.1960) - Schreiben von Helmut Kern: 15.11.1960, 25.11.1960 - Kritik: Adolf Kister (19.12.1960), Clemens Herbermann (21.12.1960), Carl Berghaus (22.12.1960), Dr. M. Meinertz (27.12.1960), Carl Wigge (04.01.1961), Albert Pauls (21.12.1960), Pfarrer Tembrink (23.12.1960), Herr Gelberg (05.07.1960), Anne Geismann (20.02.1961), Heinrich Janssen (21.06.1960) - Schreiben von Dr. Wilhelm Niemöller, 09.08.1960 - Kritik von Heinrich Luhmann: "Das neue Buch: Am Rande", Westfälische Nachrichten, 16.07.1960 - "Epigramme eines Moralisten", Der Bücherspiegel, Neues Österreich, 24.07.1960 - "Am Rande", Lübecker Nachrichten, 19.10.1961.
Akten
Standort: Großformat
Im Kartenschrank Vorl.Nr.: 100
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
09.01.2026, 12:17 PM CET