Kläger: Bernhard Leopold Volckmar von Schomburg, königlicher Justizrat, als Kurator der Catharina Schilling, geb. Schult(z)e, Witwe des Paul Christian Schilling, zu Altona, Beklagte: Abraham Herlin, für sich und als Rechtsnachfolger der Magdalena Racke, geb. Herlin, zu Hamburg, Nebenbeklagte: die holsteinischen Landesfürsten, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Johann Goy, Dr. Georg Melchior Hofmann, Dr. Johann Nicolaus Schmid, Dr. Philipp Ludwig Meckel, Streitgegenstand: Streit um die Bezahlung einer Wechselforderung gegen Paul Christian Schilling
Show full title
Kläger: Bernhard Leopold Volckmar von Schomburg, königlicher Justizrat, als Kurator der Catharina Schilling, geb. Schult(z)e, Witwe des Paul Christian Schilling, zu Altona, Beklagte: Abraham Herlin, für sich und als Rechtsnachfolger der Magdalena Racke, geb. Herlin, zu Hamburg, Nebenbeklagte: die holsteinischen Landesfürsten, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Johann Goy, Dr. Georg Melchior Hofmann, Dr. Johann Nicolaus Schmid, Dr. Philipp Ludwig Meckel, Streitgegenstand: Streit um die Bezahlung einer Wechselforderung gegen Paul Christian Schilling
LASH, Abt. 390 Nr. 465
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar >> 1 Prozessakten
1732-1741
Enthält: Rat der Stadt Altona 1732-1734, Oberappellationsgericht zu Glückstadt 1735, RKG 1736-1741; Testament 1709 der Anna Maria Schulte, Witwe des Magisters Peter Schulte, Diakon der Katharinen-Kirche zu Hamburg (Q 15); zwei Wechsel der Firma Schilling & Witwe Meurer 1711 für die Gebrüder de Smeth, gezogen auf die Firma van Sittart zu London (Q 21); Zusicherung des freien Geleits für den fallitierten Paul Christian Schilling, Kaufmann zu Hamburg, dann zu Altona, durch seine Gläubiger 1711 (Q 17); Aktenstücke aus dem Streit der Witwe Schilling mit den curatores bonorum und einzelnen Gläubigern ihres Mannes 1716-1734; Schreiben des Hamburger Rats 1732, 1735 (Q 22, 26); Zurücknahme der Klage 1740 (Q 37)
Verzeichnung
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
26.01.2026, 1:00 PM CET