Verkauf eines Geldzinses aus einer Hufe bei Gombeth an Cappel durch Kuno von Holzheim

Show full title
Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg
Data provider's object view
Urk. 18, 222
Urk. 18, Urk. A II Kl. Cappel 1322 März 21
Urk. 18 Kloster Spieskappel - [ehemals: A II]
Kloster Spieskappel - [ehemals: A II] >> 1320-1329
1322 März 21
Ausf. Perg. - Urspr. 2 Sg. abh.: 1. (Kunos) fehlt. 2. RundSg. der Stadt Wildungen (stark besch.) ab und der Ausf. beiliegend, Abb. Küch: Siegel (wie Nr.5) S.287 Nr.13
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Datum anno domini 1322 in dominica qua cantatur Letare Iherusalem

Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Ritter Kuno von Holzheim (Holczheim) und Wäppner (armiger) Ludwig gen. Prusse bekunden, daß sie mit Zustimmung Johanns, Kunos Sohn, und Hermanns und Wigands, Ludwigs Söhnen, sowie ihrer anderen Erben Abt und Konvent von Cappel einen Zins (redditus siue censum) von 6 s. Fritzlarer d. aus einer Hufe in der Feldmark von Gombeth (Gumpette) zu ewigem Besitz verkauft haben. Diese Einkünfte besaßen sie von Wäppner Konrad von Borken zu Lehen. Die Ausst. verzichten auf den Zins und leisten das Währschaftsversprechen.

Vermerke (Urkunde): Rückvermerk: (14.Jh.) Super redditibus sex solidorum de manso sito in terminis ville Gumpette, comparatis a Cunone dicto de Holtzhem milite et Lodewico dicto Prusze armigero. (15.Jh.) Gumpette. (Inventar 1527) xlii

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Dietrich von Königshain (Konnigeshain) Ratsherr (proconsul) zu Wildungen

Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: die Wildunger Schöffen Rutlieb von Hüddingen (Hudingen), Rule Becker (Pistor), Heinrich gen. Foys, Heinrich ante Valvam, Heinrich Sohn Godekens, Albert von Borken

Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: die Stadt Wildungen und Kuno von Holzheim

Vermerke (Urkunde): Weitere Überlieferung: Abschrift Kopiar K 270, 69r

Vermerke (Urkunde): Druckangaben: ---

Vermerke (Urkunde): Literatur: List: Stift Spieskappel (wie Nr.1) S.95

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
10.06.2025, 9:13 AM CEST
Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg
Data provider's object view

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg