In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Erzbischof Dietrich v. Mainz bekundet, dass er die Streitigkeiten zwischen Konrad v. Weinsberg einerseits, den Grafen Bernhard und Johann v. Solms...
Urkunden der Grafschaft Solms-Rödelheim >> 4 1441-1470
1444 April 20, Aschaffenburg
Ausf., Perg., anh. Sg. gut erh.
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Montag nach Quasimodogeniti
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Erzbischof Dietrich v. Mainz bekundet, dass er die Streitigkeiten zwischen Konrad v. Weinsberg einerseits, den Grafen Bernhard und Johann v. Solms, Gottfried und Eberhard v. Eppstein andererseits, die bereits vor dem Hofgericht zu Rottweil verhandelt worden seien, vor sich gezogen und verhandelt habe. Konrad v. Weinsberg habe geltend gemacht, dass er vor dem Hofgericht Kaiser Sigmunds 10000 Mark Gold auf die Herrschaften Falkenstein, Königstein und Münzenberg erlangt habe, und dass er diese Urkunde von König Friedrich in Frankfurt habe bestätigen lassen, trotzdem aber nicht das Geld erhalten habe. Graf Bernhard und Walther v. Eppstein dagegen erklärten, sie hätten von den Forderungen nichts gewußt und erbaten sich Aufschub. Auf Bitten Konrads läßt der Erzbischof beiden Parteien eine Urkunde ausfertigen - Zeugen: Abt Hermann v. Fulda, Abt Kuno v. Seligenstadt, Johann Flach v. Schwarzenberg, Küster, Volprecht v. Dersch, Schulmeister, sowie die Mainzer Domherren Johann v. Lindau, Konrad Rau d.Ä., Richard v. Oberstein; sodann Johann v. Schwalbach, Johanniterkomtur zu Nieder-Weisel, Meister Heinrich Leubing, kurmainzischer Kanzler, Graf Wilhelm v. Wertheim, Graf Philipp v. Rieneck, Ulrich v. Bickenbach, Schenk Philipp v. Erbach, Philipp v. Kronberg, Eberhard v. Riedern und Konrad v. Frankenstein, (alle) Ritter; Zurich v. Stetten, Henne v. Wasen, Hans d.Ä. v. Wickstadt, Hans v. Selbach, Schelm v. Bergen, Frank d.J. v. Kronberg, Konrad v. Romrod und Bernhard v. Schwalbach
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Aussteller (Sekret)
Vermerke (Urkunde): Druckangaben: Dr.: Battenberg, Reichskämmerer Konrad v. Weinsberg und die Erbschaft, in AHG NF 35, 1977, S. 99-176, hier Nr. 30
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution 4.0 International