Urteilsbegründungen der Assessoren am Tribunal
Show full title
0388
LAG, Rep. 29 Wismarer Tribunal
Wismarer Tribunal >> 02. Relationen
01.10.1842-31.12.1842
Der Pächter Tamms zu Klein Schönwalde contra den Pächter Melms. - Der Mühlenmeister Copahs zu Tribsees contra das Tribseeser Magistrat. - Pastor Peltz zu Behrenhof contra den von Behr. - Der Hausmann Grotjohann in Stettin contra den Hausmann Hossfeld in Stralsund. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Ackermann Michael Plönz zu Loitz. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Jungen Wilhelm Heinrich Brabant. - Untersuchungssachen gegen Johann Joachim Theodor Wallenstein. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Kuhburschen Joachim Heinrich Grünthal. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den ehemaligen Bürgermeister Christian Wilhelm Ramelow zu Tribsees. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Friedrich Ludwig Georg Atmer. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Maurergesellen Wittenberg. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Stellmacher Johan Carl Jenzen aus Richtenberg. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Dienstknecht Johann Christian Ludwig Jäger. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Kaufmann Friedrich Carl Christian Rasdorf. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Büdner Stüvemann zu Elmenhorst. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Arbeitsmann Carl Christian Wiedemann. - Louise Dorothea Christiane Biesner contra ihren Ehemann. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Dienstknecht Christian Vollmann. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Witt. - Der Gutsbesitzer Dudy auf Zarnitz contra Kellmann in Wolgast. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Bäckergesellen Johann Georg Emanuel Strübing. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Tagelöhner Carl Friedrich Zelck. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Pastor Carl Friedrich Wilhelm Lietz zu Kirch Baggendorf. - Untersuchungssachen gegen den Pächter Johann Heinrich Rüterbusch. - Der Kaufmann Wiese in Greifswald contra den Hofgerichtsrat Ziemsen zu Greifswald. -
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
29.10.2025, 11:26 AM CET
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International