In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Margarete (Grete) Stecker (Stecher), Tochter des Bartholdt Stecker in Vinsebeck gegen Zimmermeister Hermann Möller (Möllen, Müller, Mühlenherman, Mollern) in Schönemark, wegen einer Eheklage
Margarete (Grete) Stecker (Stecher), Tochter des Bartholdt Stecker in Vinsebeck gegen Zimmermeister Hermann Möller (Möllen, Müller, Mühlenherman, Mollern) in Schönemark, wegen einer Eheklage
Geistliches Gericht in Lippe >> 9. Nr. 1601 - 1800
1608-1610
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält auch: Die Zeugen: 1) Tönies Gördner in der Schirenmarckte [Schönemark] Amt Detmold, ungefähr 24 Jahre alt (1609), verwandt mit Grete Stecker und Möller; 2) Elmerhausen Gunter zu Vinsebeck, an 40 Jahre alt (1608); 3) Berndt Heuwinkel, ungefähr 50 Jahre alt (1609); 4) Elmerhausen Mönnikeß, ungefähr an 50 Jahre alt (1609); 5) Diederich Kruse zu Vinsebeck (Fynsbecke), an 32 Jahre alt (1608), Sagenschneider; 6) Bartholdt Stecker zu Oienhaußen [Oeynhausen bei Bergheim], an 31 Jahre alt (1608), Bruder der Grete Stecker; 7) Bernhart Vollandt, Schreiber der Junker von der Lippe zu Vinsebeck, ungefähr an 80 Jahre alt (1609); Bernhard Cratander, Notar zu Steinheim (Westfalen), vernimmt Zeugen am 2.1.1609; Albert Molitor, Sekretär in Steinheim (Westfalen), vernimmt Zeugen; weiter Johannes von der Wipper, Henrichs Sohn, Prokurator beim Geistlichen Konsistorium in Detmold; Simon und Moritz von der Lippe, Gefettern, Erbsessen zu Vinsebeck, stellen Urkunde aus, 18.6.1610. Simon, Moritz, und Frantz Symon, Gefettern von der Lippe, in Vinsebeck, schreiben am 28.12.1608
Geistliches Gericht
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.