In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage des Dr. jur. Johan Henrich Quinckenius ./. Witwe Lic. Bisping geb. Agnes Heerde wegen einer Sohde
Enthält: Klage des Dr. jur. Johan Henrich Quinckenius an der Königstraße (vertreten durch Prokurator Christoffer Schwick) gegen die Witwe Syndikus Lic. Bisping geb. Agnes Heerde, 1706, wegen der Sohde. Schwiegersohn der Beklagten die Dr. Fortunat Wedemhove, Tochter der Beklagten ist die Witwe Dr. Nateler. Kläger hat sein Haus 1705 von seinem Bruder Hofkaplan Johan Quinckenius erworben. Erwähnt werden: M. Herman Wevel am Katthagen; Henrich Eilkers; Maurermeister Berndt Möllers; Herman Torbecke; Herman Gerversman; Bernard Püffken; Kleinschnitzler Herman Buschoff; Henrich Bohmer; Steinhaueramtsgildemeister Rotger Thombrock; M. Wilhelm Averbeck; Notar Johan Poett; Notar Henrich Varvick; Notar Gerard Herman Humperdinck; Notar Christian Müllinckhoff; Everwin Buschoff; cand. theol. Everhard Keuper; Türwärter Johan Neuhaus; Pumpenmacher Joachim Fröndt; Johan Weylinck; Berndt Kokman; Henrich Volmer; Everhard Esters; Johan Dobbing; M. Herman Busch; Gerdt Dummelkamp; Theologe Johan Mauritz Hundstegge; Schmied Berndt Gerdes; Anlage in Abschrift: Am 23. 4. 1700 verkauft Elisabeth Gertrud von Staden, Witwe Walter Henrich Berning,, dem Johan Quinckenius, Münst. Hofkaplan, Kanonikus an Martini, der Domkirche Vikar und Werkmeister, ihr Haus an der Königstraße zwischen dem Kerckeringschen Hof zur Südseite und Dr. Nadelers Haus zur Nordseite, mit den Kirchenbänken und sonstigen Gerechtigkeiten. Verkäuferin wohnt auf der Georgskommende. Zeugen: Bildhauer Wilhelm Henrich Koch und Steinhauer Herman Frohne. Notar: Herman Plencker.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
