In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Verfahren gegen den Bäckergesellen Henrich Arndts wegen Diebstahls
Enthält: Bäckergeselle Henrich Arndts, gebürtig aus Metelen, 19 Jahre alt, hat dem Schneider Jakob Achterberg aus Brüssel 108 Thaler gestohlen. Der Vater Heiner Hardenacke, die Mutter Elisabeth Bruns, die alte Mutter Gertrud Moll und die Jungfern Anna van der Wick, Katharina Dreier und Engel Gefoge im Kloster Niesinck, wo auch eine Verwandte des Angeklagten namens Margarete Froling ist, bitten um seine Freilassung. Er wird darauf am 10. Dezember 1649 aus dem Gefängnis, dem untersten Keller unter der Schreiberei, entlassen. Er soll auch den französischen Kaufleuten Berndt Telleman und Markus Galleian auf dem Domhof Waren gestohlen haben, leugnet dieses aber. Erwähnt werden Melchior Gudorp; Herman Becker; Gertgen Becke auf der Jüdefelderstraße; Johan von der Heydt; die Bäcker Johan Rokelose, Johan Gelsinck und Henrich Borst; Augustin Vos aus Metelen im Kloster Groß-Burlo.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.