In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Schuldforderungen des Johann Brugmann an Helene von Münstereifel Wittwe von Clemens Perfeck.
Rathausarchiv >> Urkunden Mittelalter und Frühe Neuzeit
1565 März 26
Regest: Auszug aus dem Gerichtsbuch der Stadt Köln vom 26. bzw. 27. März 1565. Schuldforderung des Johann Brügemann und der Margarethe von Werden, Eingesessene der Stadt Köln, gegen Helene von Münstereifel, Witwe des Meisters Clemens Perfeck über 39 Taler weniger 6 Albus wegen gelieferter Waren (Tuch und Seide), Margriet von Andernachs desgleichen über 149 Taler wegen gelieferter Waren, des Dederich Pflüger im namen seines Vaters Werner Pflüger wegen 156 Taler 8 Gulden Überforderung wegen gelieferten Karmeseins. Meister Ulrich Hueffnagels von Augsburg und Hermann Vei von Zülch, Vormünder der unmündigen Kinder Margarete, Hildebrand, Johann und Helena Perfeck bestellen zu Bürgen Meister Albert von Waltneill, Apotheker, und Meister Jacob Gelßbach, Hueckenmecher, zur Sicherung der Ansprüche ihrer Mündel.
Ausfertigung. Doppelblatt Papier. Mit aufgedrücktem Signet der Stadt Köln (Krone, ohne Umschrfit) und Unterschrift von Hermann Veltman.
Urkunden
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
