In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthält: Mitteilung Dietrichs III. von Manderscheid an seinen Vater Dietrich II. über die bevorstehende Einung der Eifelherren zu Münstermaifeld (1465 August 3); Verschreibung Bodendorfs durch Graf Dietrich V. von Manderscheid an Johann Mertloch von Rheinbach für 1200 fl. (1553 Februar 3); Vollmacht der Gräfin Magdalena von Manderscheid für Johann von Graeß, Lic. iur., zum Empfang der kurtrierischen Lehen für ihre Kinder (1600 Juni 20); Vollmacht der Schwestern Magdalena, Erika, Anna Salome, Maria Katharina und Claudia, Gräfinnen zu Manderscheid, für Wilhelm Vendevill als Prokurator beim Hohen Rat zu Mecheln (1600 Dezember 15); Citatio ad reassumendum des Reichskammergerichts an die Stadt Mayen im Prozeß mit den Erben der Magdalena von Manderscheid (1610 April 24, Speyer); Einigung zwischen Karl von Manderscheid-Gerolstein und Friedrich Ludwig von Löwenstein-Wertheim über die Auslegung der testamentarischen Verfügungen der Wild- und Rheingräfin Claudia, geb. Gräfin von Manderscheid (1623 September 7, Virneburg); Ausgleich von Ferdinand Ludwig und Wilhelm Ernst von Manderscheid-Gerolstein mit den Grafen von Löwenstein-Wertheim wegen des Reichskammergerichtsurteils über die Ansprüche der Herren von Metternich als Erben des Dietrich Nagel (1663 November 9, Schloß Gerolstein).
7 Schr.
Archivale
Graeß, Johann von, Lic. iur.
Löwenstein-Wertheim, Haus
Manderscheid, Grafen von
Mertloch, Johann, Rheinbach
Metternich, Herren
Nagel, Dietrich
Nassau-Wiesbaden, Grafen, Magdalena
Vendevill,Wilhelm, Prokurator in Mecheln
Wild- und Rheingrafen, Claudia, geb. Gräfin von Manderscheid-Schleiden
Bodendorf : Sinzig AW
Mayen MYK
Mecheln, Prov. Antwerpen, Belgien, Hoher Rat
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.