In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthält u.a.: Nr. 1a: DD. Eck, d. Dialogo Contj et Fritz. 28. August 1521; Nr. 1b: Bürgermeister u. Rath in Zürich an Bischof Hugo zu Konstanz betr. Zwinglis dritter Einladung. Januar 1524; Nr. 1c: Der Bischof an die theol. Fac. 13. Januar 1524; Nr. 1d: Derselbe an dies. 30. Januar 1524; Nr. 1e: Ders. an Hattus (Müller) und Jac. Lemst. 11. März 1524; Nr. 1f: Ders. an die Fac. 16. Maerz 1524; Nr. 1g: Ders. an dieselbe. 11. April 1524; Nr. 1h: Rescript betr. des Bischofs Schrift von Bildung der Heiligen und S. Mass. Stuttgart, 17. März 1524; Nr. 1i: D. J. Fabri fordert Abfassung einer Schrift gegen die Lutheraner. 20. März 1530; Nr. 1k: Rescript betr. des Barthol. Hagen confessio de coena. Dmni 5. September/9. Oktober 1559; ad 1: S. Schnurrer Erläuterungen S. 259: Heyd Herzog Ulrich III, 571; Nr. 2a: Joanes Sylvanus Rescr. Sereniss. Christoph. 7. Oktober 1559; Nr. 2b: Schreiben des Sylvanus. 2. November 1559; Nr. 2c: Supplicatio Sylvani s.a; Nr. 2d-2e: Schreiben v. Joh. Brenz. 16. Dezember 1559; Nr. 2f: Fürstl. Rescript.(s. Monumenta viror Mgstr. I. p. bis pur G. h. 699.) 28. Dezember 1559; Nr. 3: Jo. Brentz Schrift de sacra coena. 18. März 1560; Nr. 3a: Jo. Brentz Schrift de sacra coena. 17. April 1560; Nr. 4: Herzog z. Sachsen Weimar begehrt Bedenken über Wigands Buch über die Erbsünde contra Illyricum 1571; Nr. 5: Der Jac. Scheck de Trinitate. 1576; Nr. 6: Egidius Hunnius Marpurgs: petit judicium de confesione sua. 1577; Nr. 7: De libro Schrappio abbatis Maulbronnensis. 1580; Nr. 8-8a: Liber Matth. Vogelii abbatis Alpirsbacensis. 1580; Nr. 9: Commentaria incerti auctoris in Apocalypsin. 1593; Nr. 10: Judicium de luco succiso Platzii. 1594; Nr. 11: Andr. Osiandri secundum scriptum contra Gregorium Valentianum. 1594; Nr. 12: Scriptum theologorum württembergensium contra Pistorium. August 1596; Nr. 12a: Zangeri calumniae. 6. September 1606; Nr. 13: Maximil. Rheinmann petit censuram concionum suarum. 1609; Nr. 14-14a: Jo. Pappus refutationem scripti Bispontini belangend. 1610; Nr. 15-15d: Augsburgische Apologie wider das Ingolstadtsche Colloquium (Melchior Volz). 1609-1610; Nr. 16-16b: Jo. Walter in Danzig. 1612-1613; Nr. 17-17a: Hutteri Concordia concors (Schreiben Lotters) 1613; Nr. 18-18e: Predigt des M. Jo. Hippolytus Brentz zu Freudenstadt. 1614; Nr. 19: Responsionis prodomus ad Balth. Meissnerum ("scripsi raptissime"). 2. Mai 1611; Nr. 20: Censur eines Buchs vom Consistor verlangt. 1615; Nr. 21-21m: Linz'sche Akta, Agenda betreffend; In Agenda Dan. Hitzler (Theodor. Werlin). 1615-1614; Nr. 22-22c: Censur über Catechismuspredigt. 1618 (13. Oktober, 17. Oktober, 19. November); Nr. 23: Thom. Wegelinus. Durlach, 23. November 1618; Nr. 24-24a: Bedenken über das Buch des Germ. Rastmann (Rathmann/Rahtmann?), über das Reich Christi. 1622; Nr. 25: Donner Jo. petit censuram (Limpurg Gaildorf) scripti. 12. März 1622; Nr. 26: Abbas Maulbronnensis M. Volz begehrt sein scriptum unter die Hand zu zuführen, 1. Januar 1622.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.