In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Domkapitel Minden - Akten >> 37. Landständische Angelegenheiten
1741-1763
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält: Differenzen zwischen dem Domkapitel und der Ritterschaft in den Jahren von 1714-1741 wider die im Jahre 1525 geschlossene und 1581 sowie 1595 erneuerte Union über die Bestellung des Landsyndikus Gravamina des Domkapitels o.D. Anspruch der Ritterschaft auf ein Mitspracherecht bei der Ausschreibung der Landtage 1714 Königliche Instruktion bzw. Notifikation der Verwaltungsreform hinsichtlich der Kriegskommissariate 1722 Proposition zum Landtag: u.a. Gymnasium zu Lingen, Eigentumsordnung 1726 Auseinandersetzungen um die Auflösung der Union zwischen Domkapitel und Ritterschaft 1737-1747 Beratungen zur Revision des Katasters 1741 Rechnung der Obersteuerklasse zu Minden 1740-1741 Entrichtung der von den kurmärkischen Ständen vorgeschossenen Marschgelder für 1743-1748 Dispositionsgelder 1762 Ankauf eines Hauses am Markte in Minden für die Landschaft 1763
Sachakte
Digitalisat vorhanden: Original für die Nutzung gesperrt. Digitalisat vorhanden
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.