In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Appellationis Auseinandersetzung um Räumung eines Gutes
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 11. 1. Kläger K
02.08.1725-03.08.1725
Kläger: (2) Hans Jacob Bartels, Pächter des Hofes "Große Flöte" (Bekl. in 1. Instanz)
Beklagter: Witwe und Erben des Bürgermeisters Johann Kuhlmann (Kl. in 1. Instanz)
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Peter Rudolph Schröder (A), Dr. Cajus Matthias Arend (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Kl. soll auf Forderung der Bekl. das von ihm seit 1710 gepachtete Gut räumen. Da beide Seiten noch Forderungen aneinander haben, auf deren Abgeltung sie sich nicht einigen können, sollen sie diese zunächst vor dem Rat beschwören, damit der die zu zahlenden Summen festlegen kann. Bekl. dringen auf Veränderung ihres Eides und setzen diese vor Rat durch, weshalb Kl. an das Tribunal appelliert und auf seinem Recht, der Abstattung der vereinbarten Eide, besteht. Außerdem bittet er um Bleiberecht auf dem Hof für sich und sein Vieh. Am 03.08.1725 lehnt das Tribunal das Gesuch ab.
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Supplik des Kl.s an den Rat vom 28.07.1725; Ratsgerichtsurteile vom 27. und 31.07.1725 (2); von Notar Georg Augustin Pladecius aufgenommene Appellation vom 01.08.1725; Auszug einer Supplik, die der Pächter Schröder zu Lewitzow bei der Schweriner Justizkanzlei eingereicht hat, vom 24.05.1725
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
