In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Mandatum de relaxando arresto personali Auseinandersetzung um die Freilassung aus dem Arrest
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 20. 1. Kläger T
16.10.1666-26.10.1666
Kläger: (2) Ilsabe Schwassen, Ehefrau des Joachim Hansen
Beklagter: Bürgermeister und Rat der Stadt Wismar
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Lic. Johannes Thurmann (A & P) Bekl.: Dr. Caspar Schwarzkopf (A), Dr. Ambrosius Petersen (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Kl.in ist vor 3 Wochen, als sie mit einem Wagen zu ihrem in Lübeck krank daniederliegenden Ehemann fahren wollte, von einem Ratsdiener auf Verlangen der Bürgen ihres Mannes arretiert worden. Damit sollte ihre angebliche Flucht zu ihrem Manne verhindert werden, der vor seiner Reise nach Lübeck Bürgen stellen mußte wegen einer Ohrfeige und einer deshalb angedrohten Geldstrafe von 1.000 Rtlr vor dem Ratsgericht. Kl.in bittet um Aufhebung des Arrestes, das Tribunal folgt dem Antrag am selben Tag. Am 19.10. beschwert sich Kl.in, daß der Rat sie noch nicht hat ziehen lassen und erbittet erneut Mandat des Tribunals, das sie am 20.10. erhält. Am 21.10.1666 berichtet Rat, daß Kl.in verschiedene Güter habe ausführen wollen, weshalb ihr die Ausreise verweigert worden sei. Nachdem sie ein Inventar ihres Besitzes hinterlassen hat, darf sie Wismar jedoch verlassen.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1666
Prozessbeilagen: (7) von Tribunalspedell Christoph Havemann ausgestellte Übergabequittung für ein Tribunalsmandat vom 17.10.1666; Ratsgerichtsurteil vom 17.10.1666
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
