In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Untersuchung gegen den Münzmeister von Rietberg namens Hans Konerman wegen Falschmünzerei
Enthält: Gegen den Münzmeister von Rietberg namens Hans Konerman ist auf kaiserlichen Befehl eine Untersuchung wegen Falschmünzerei eingeleitet, die Dr. Konrad Betzdorff und Gottschalk Frechen in Köln führen. Der Münzzeichenschneider Peter Baum soll Konerman dabei geholfen haben. Der Rat in Münster stellt Ermittlungen in Emden, Hamburg und Bremen an. Baum wird verhaftet und in Schönefliet gefangen gesetzt. Hier wird er am 12.12.1570 von dem Drosten zu Wolbeck, Ludger von Raesfeld, dem Domkapitelsyndikus Lic. Johan Schade und den domkapitularischen Gografen Christian Lennep und Johan Uphuis in Gegenwart der Zeugen Philipp Toppeshoff und Walter Hagenstert verhört. Er wird entlassen, später aber vom Rat in Münster wieder verhaftet und am 26. Januar 1571 vernommen. Der Rat berichtet an den Kaiser. Am 21.7.1571 wird als der Mittäterschaft verdächtig der Jude Berndt aus Warendorf verhört. Erwähnt werden Wilbrand Nagel; Kaufmann Mathias Werkmann in Ulm; Goldschmied Hans Ordelman in Cöln; Thomas Timpe in Minden.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
CC0 1.0 Universal