In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthält: - Testamentsklausel Margaret zur Linden (Abschrift) nebst dto Bleicken
- Letztwillige Verfügungen des Vikars Bernhardt Bleke (1578/79, 1587, 29.9. 1592, 30.9. 1592)
- Kopie einer Obligation des Melchior Hanekow und seiner Frau Catharina zum Busche (8.3.1619)
- Schuldschein des Jost van Vorden (26.10.1585)
- Berndt Overhueß und Anna tor Horst bestätigen, von Meister Johan Wesselinck und Meister Albrecht Mumme, Handgetreue der +Margarethen tor Lynden, 50 Goldgulden erhalten zu haben, die Margarethe der Anna testamentarisch vermacht hatte. Zeugen: Johan Plaggen und Herman Finneman. Unterschrift: Conradus Bokelman, Notarius (6.7.1548)
- "Recognitum Herman Schulten Meßingk zu Senden uff 100 Reichstaler in termino Laetare die Pension davon zuverrichten." (13.12.1636)
- Vergleich bzgl. Bezahlung rückständiger Pensionen, die Herr von Medefort zum Hertzhauße den Testamentsexekutoren der Margarethe Aldthauß zu Aldenhause verschrieben hat (27.2.1692)
- Rentbriefe Margarethe tor Linden und deren Verwaltung (1605-1776)
- Urkundenabschriften und Quittungen der Stiftung Bleicken (1603/1779)
- Quittungen über Zahlungen der Bleicken-Zurlinden-Stiftung (1648/1811)
- Franz Twyst zahlt ein aus der Stiftung Bleicken entnommenes Kapital von 100 Reichstalern den Provisoren St. Aegidii zurück (14/19. Juli 1618)
- Gerichtskosten in Sachen Joannes Dam, Küster von St. Aegidii, als Emonitor testamenti Bernardi Bleiken contra Henricum Weschman, Bürger in Münster (1679)
- Rechnungsregister Stiftung Bleicken (1616)
- Rentberechnungen und Urkundenabschriften Stiftung Bleicken (1711/54)
- "Clausula ex testamento d. Bernhardi Bekenn" (13.9.1593)
- Vergleich zwischen dem Kötter Joh. Bernard Wellenkamp und Grothus (1802)
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
