In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Ilsche Vieregge (Viereggingk) zu Stadenhausen gegen Ludolph Wrampe im Heßloh, Sohn der Eheleute Henrich Wrampe und Ilschen Sultemeyer, wegen einer Ehesache.
Ilsche Vieregge (Viereggingk) zu Stadenhausen gegen Ludolph Wrampe im Heßloh, Sohn der Eheleute Henrich Wrampe und Ilschen Sultemeyer, wegen einer Ehesache.
Geistliches Gericht in Lippe >> 11. Nr. 2001 - 2200
1595-1600, 1616-1622
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält auch: Die Zeugen: 1) Garden Annekens Sohn Cordt, itzo Herman Benen [Beine] Knecht zu Jerxen, 20 Jahre alt (1620); 2) Jobst Körner zu Stadenhausen, 33 Jahre alt (1620); Erwähnt werden weiter Bartoldt und Johann, Vater und Sohn Vieregge; Die junge Ebbeckersche im Heßloh war eine Schwester des Ludolph Wrampe; Cordt und Jasper, Gebrüder Geuekotten, Gutsherrn des Kolons Johann Vieregge zu Staenßen (Stadenhausen); Notar Conrad Luthmann, nimmt in Lage und Lemgo Verträge auf; Heinrich Schwerter, gräflich lippischer Kanzleibote in Detmold und Zusteller
Geistliches Gericht
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.