In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Appellationis Auseinandersetzung um Branntweinbrennen ohne vorherige Akzisezahlung
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 07. 1. Kläger G
(1725) 15.08.1725-03.10.1726
Kläger: (2) Witwe des Jochim Grebbin (Bekl. in 1. Instanz)
Beklagter: N N Warner, N N Haase und N N Barg, Visitatoren des Gewettes (Kl. in 1. Instanz)
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Lucas Friedrich Schroeder (A), Dr. Cajus Matthias Arend (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Gewett hat überraschend bei den Branntweinbrennern kontrolliert, ob es jemanden unter ihnen gäbe, der vorher kein Branntwein Schrot auf der Accise frey gemacht." Die angetrunkenen Bekl. beschuldigen Kl.in, die gerade beim Brennen war, über das durch Akzise gedeckte Maß hinaus zu brennen und verurteilen sie zu 200 Mk. lüb. Strafe. Kl.in bittet Tribunal um Kassation des Urteils und 14tägigen Arrest für die Visitatoren, wird aber am 02.10.1725 abschlägig beschieden. Auch der Antrag des neuen Ehemannes der Kl.in vom 20.07.1726 auf Rehabilitation der Kl. und Verhandlung vor dem Tribunal wird am 02.10.1726 abgelehnt.
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Ratsgerichtsurteile vom 12.05. und 18.07.1725; von Notar Philipp Heinrich Pladecius aufgenommene Appellation vom 25.07.1725; Schreiben der Kl.in an Notar P. H. Pladecius vom 24.04.1725; von Notar P.H. Pladecius aufgenommene Befragung des August Friedrich Kirchhof und des N N Barg vom 24.04.1725
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
