In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Reichskammergerichtsprozeß Hilmars von Quernheim, später Lippes, gegen Minden über die Ulenburg und daran hängende Holzrechte
Auswärtiger Besitz des Hauses Lippe >> 6. Ulenburg >> 6.1. Ulenburg unter Hilmar von Quernheim
1577-1591
Enthaeltvermerke: enthält v.a.: Verzeichnisse der Übergriffe Mindens gegen Hilmar von Quernheim in der Schieder Mark (1576-78) (bezieht sich auf L 51 Nr. 44/5); Verhandlungen Mindens mit Hilmar von Quernheim während treuhänderischer Verwaltung der Schieder Mark (vgl. L 51 Nr. 45) durch Graf Otto von Holstein und den Obristen von Holle; Reichskammergerichtsprotokolle (1578); Klagen Hilmars von Quernheim vor dem Reichskammergericht wegen unvollkommener Befolgung des Mandats durch Minden mitsamt Kostenaufstellungen; Klageartikel Simons VI. wegen unvollständiger Befolgung des Mandats durch Minden; Paritionsanzeige und Rechtfertigungsartikel des Bischofs von Minden; Repliken Hilmars von Quernheim und Simons zur Lippe darauf; weitere Einlassungen und Repliken beider Seiten; Berichte des Prokurators Christodorus Engelhardt an Lippe; Prozeßprotokolle
Auswärtiger Besitz
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.