In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Supplicationis Auseinandersetzung um Leistung von Hofdiensten
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 05. 1. Kläger E
(1744) 03.10.1753-17.10.1753
Kläger: (2) Hinrich Evers und Jochim Beyer, Büdner in Fehrdorf
Beklagter: Johann Valentin Gustav Hennings, Pächter des Amtes Poel
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Joachim Christoph Gabriel Hasse (A & P) Bekl.: Dr. Christoph Erich Hertzberg (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Kl. sind überraschend zu Hofdiensten veranlagt worden, obwohl sie zu deren Leistung als Büdner und Fischer nicht in der Lage sind und bisher pro Jahr 3 Rtlr anstelle der Dienste gegeben haben. Sie bitten, es dabei zu belassen und Bekl. entsprechend anzuweisen. Das Tribunal fordert Bekl. am 05.10. auf zu berichten und Kl. nicht über Herkommen zu beschweren. Am 09.10. erbitten Kl. ein Strafmandat gegen Bekl., da dieser seinen Willen gegen sie vollstreckt und die Mandate des Tribunals nicht achtet. Das Tribunal fordert Bekl. am selben Tag bei 20 Rtlr Strafe zu Bericht und Einstellung der Vollstreckung auf. Am 13.10. besteht Bekl. auf Leistung der Dienste, die ihm im Pachtvertrag zugesagt worden sind, am 16.10.1753 weist das Tribunal Kl. zur Leistung der Dienste an, verbietet Bekl. aber, zusätzlich Dienstgeld zu kassieren.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1753
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Auszug aus dem Verlängerungsvertrag über das Amt Poel zwischen Amtmann Johann Cornelius von Müller und Bürgermeister und Rat zu Wismar vom 24.01.1744
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
