Kläger: Domkapitel zu Hamburg, Beklagte: Thomas Heinrich Öding, Julius Heinrich Öding, Ditmer Körner, Michael Körner, Jürgen Caspar Rüttger, Berend Jacob Diercks, Johann Albert Bornemann, Peter Heinsohn, Claus Groth, Albert Groth und Dirk Beermann zu Wedel und Schulau, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Philipp Jacob Rasor, Dr. Christian Jacob von Zwierlein, Streitgegenstand: Streit um die Bemessungsgrundlage und Anlieferungspflicht bei Getreideabgaben an das Domkapitel

Show full title
Landesarchiv Schleswig-Holstein
Data provider's object view
Kläger: Domkapitel zu Hamburg, Beklagte: Thomas Heinrich Öding, Julius Heinrich Öding, Ditmer Körner, Michael Körner, Jürgen Caspar Rüttger, Berend Jacob Diercks, Johann Albert Bornemann, Peter Heinsohn, Claus Groth, Albert Groth und Dirk Beermann zu Wedel und Schulau, Prozessvertreter: Dr. Philipp Jacob Rasor, Dr. Christian Jacob von Zwierlein, Streitgegenstand: Streit um die Bemessungsgrundlage und Anlieferungspflicht bei Getreideabgaben an das Domkapitel
LASH, Abt. 390 Nr. 156
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar
Abt. 390 Reichskammergericht zu Speyer bzw. Wetzlar >> 1 Prozessakten
1771-1785
Enthält: Amtmann zu Pinneberg 1771, Oberappellationsgericht zu Glückstadt 1772-1774, RKG 1775-1785; Vergleiche vom 08.08., 01.12., 09.12.1732 zwischen dem Domkapitel und König Christian VI., den königlichen Räten, über die niedere Gerichtsbarkeit und die Verwendung bestimmter Maßeinheiten in Poppenbüttel und Spitzerdorf in der Herrschaft Pinneberg (Q 12); Aufstellungen und Abrechnungen über Getreidelieferungen 1740, 1751-1774 (Q 13-14, 16, Beilage); Schreiben des Domkapitels, des Altonaer Oberpräsidenten und der königlichen Räte 1759-1761 über die "unchristliche Schwelgerei an dem bekannten Thomastage" (Q 16-17); Petschaften des Dr. Johann Hinrich Detenhoff, Syndikus des Domkapitels, und des Domherren Dr. Johann Julius Palm zu Hamburg 1775 (Q 22)
Verzeichnung

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Es gelten die gesetzlichen Bestimmungen des Landesarchivs Schleswig-Holstein.
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
26.01.2026, 12:56 PM CET
Landesarchiv Schleswig-Holstein
Data provider's object view

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Landesarchiv Schleswig-Holstein