In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Verhandlungen und Entscheidungen des Schöppenstuhls zu Brandenburg
4D Brandenburg (4996) Rep. 4D Schöppenstuhl zu Brandenburg (Havel)
Rep. 4D Schöppenstuhl zu Brandenburg (Havel)
1600
Enthält (laut Inhaltsverzeichnis sowie Alphabetischen Verzeichnissen von 1887):
Alt Ruppin: Diebstahl (Hunert v. Zerwest, Hauptmann) (185-186); Holzdiebstahl (138-139). - Angermünde, Eigentumssache (189-190). - Arendsee, Schadenersatzsache (344-345). - Arnswalde: Diebstahl (173-182); Diebstahl und Unzucht (317-320). - Aulosen (Claus v. Jagow), Diebstahl (324-329). - Bad Schönfließ (Schönfließ) b. Schwedt/Oder, Mord/Totschlag (336-339). - Badingen (Levin Friedrich v. Trott), Diebstahl (396-397). - Bantikow (Die v. Grabow), Zauberei (240-247). - Beelitz, Diebstahl (273-276). - Berlin/Cölln: Diebstahl (383-386 und 394-395); Schuldensache (398-403); Unzucht und Blutschande (211-219). - Birnheim, Erbsache (54-55). - Boitzenburg (Bernd v. Arnim), Kindesmord (232-233). - Börnicke, Injurien (118-119). - Borstell (wohl Burgstall), Mehrere Vergehen (24-36). - Brunow (Werner v. Thermo), Mord (164-172). - Buch b. Berlin (Zacharias v. Röbel), Diebstahl (91-97). - Cottbus (Otto Hake v. Berchem auf Briesen, Hauptmann zu Cottbus und Peitz), Brandstiftung (88-90). - Dallgow, Injurien (112-117). - Driesen (Hasso v. Bredow, Hauptmann), Zauberei (mit bemerkenswertem Geständnis) (64-85). - Eichstedt/Altmark (Ditlof v. Eichstädt), Schlägerei (248-252). - Eickerhöfe (Georg Gans Edler zu Putlitz), Unzucht (187-188). - Fehrbellin (Bellin) (Jacob Kühne, Amtmann), Mord/Totschlag (61-62). - Flatow, Erbsache (315-316). - Fredenwalde (Die v. Arnim), Diebstahl (225-231). - Friedeberg, Mord (134-135). - Fürstenau b. Neuwedell (Die v. Wedel auf Neuwedell), Totschlag (361-366). - Gardelegen: Erbsache (340-343); Mord (56-58). - Gransee: Brandstiftung (142-143); Erbsache (86-87); Gildesache (Tuchmachergewerk) (157-158). - Guben (Jobst v. Carlowitz, Hauptmann zu Lebus), Pferdediebstahl (120-121). - Havelberg: Erbsache (150-156); Unzucht (37-40). - Jessen, Diebstahl (406). - Jüterbog, Erbsache (387-388). - Kannenberg, Diebstahl (408). - Karow, Erbsache (255-256). - Karthaus b. Schivelbein, Brandstiftung und Diebstahl (1-16). - Klein Mangelsdorf (Mangelsdorf) (Gebhard v. Tresckow), Zauberei (379-382). - Klein Ziethen b. Kremmen (Hans v. Bredow), Diebstahl (1602, 144-149). - Klötzin (Henning v. Glasenapp), Injurien (131-132). - Krumke b. Osterburg (Christoph und Fritz v. Kannenberg auf K. sowie Ernst und Heinrich v. Klötze (Klotz) auf Sanne b. Stendal, Gebrüder), Diebstahl (407). - Küstrin, Diebstahl, Wilddieberei (288-299). - Kyritz: Erbsache (305-309); Erbsache und Injurien (346-358). - Landsberg/Warthe, Diebstahl (391-393). - Lebus, Mord (280-282). - Leitzkau (Matthias v. Münchhausen, Sohn des Hilmar v. M.), Zauberei (421-423). - Lietzow b. Nauen: Diebstahl (Die v. Bredow) (303-304); Erbsache (Die v. Döberitz) (63-63a). - Lübars, Erbsache (257). - Mahlsdorf (Christian Distelmeyer), Ehebruch (197-202). - Meßdorf (Mestorf) b. Bismark (Die v. Bartensleben), Unzucht (133). - Müncheberg, Erbsache (321-323). - Nauen, Erbsache (140-141). - Neuendorf b. Gardelegen, Diebstahl . (191-196). - Neuruppin, Unzucht/Ehebruch (223). - Neustadt/Meckl., Zauberei (125-130, 236-239 und 404-405). - Neustadt-Eberswalde, Brandstiftung (283-287). - Neuwedell (Neu-Wedel) (Die v. Wedel): Diebstahl (258-270); Injurien (203-204). - Perleberg, Diebstahl (389-390). - Pessin, Erbsache (253-254). - Potsdam, Erbsache (277-279). - Rathenow: Bigamie und Diebstahl (136-137); Erbsache (220-222); Mehrere Vergehen (415). - Rühstädt (Dietrich v. Quitzow’s Erben), Injurien (367-372). - Salzwedel, Brandstiftung (205-210). - Saßleben (Friedrich v. Bernheim), Pferdediebstahl (109). - Schernikau (Schernikow) und Käthen, Injurien (271-272). - Schinne, Erbsache (376-378). - Schollene (Die v. Tresckow), Rechtswidrige Hinrichtung (41-46). - Seehausen, Notzucht (59-60). - Serwest, Erbsache (313-314). - Soldin, Totschlag (19-23). - Spandau, Diebstahl (300-302). - Stendal: Erbsache (107-108); Geldsache (Christoph v. Sanne und Theodor Rodetidichius, Prediger zu St. Marien in St.) (412-414). - Stuer . (Stauer) (Johann Ulrich v. Flotow), Rossdienstsache (330-331). - Tangermünde: Erbsache (122-124); Totschlag (Asmus v. Kannenberg) (98-101). - Templin, Erbsache (359-360). - Tramnitz (Claus und Christoph v. Rohr), Erbsache (310-312). - Wahrenberg, Erbsache (183-184). - Werben/Elbe, Unterhaltssache (332-333). - Wittstock/Dosse: Einbruch (50-53); Injurien (17-18). - Wusterhausen/Dosse, Erbsache (102-106). - Zabelsdorf (Levin Friedrich v. Trott auf Badingen), Erbsache (110-111). - Zechlin, Unzucht/Ehebruch (334-335). - Zehden, Totschlag durch einen Landsknecht (373-375). - Ziesar, Pferdediebstahl (47). - Zossen (Wedigo Reimar Gans Edler zu Putlitz), Drohungen und Injurien (159-163 und 416-420).
Ohne Ortsangabe: Erbsache (48-49 und 408-409); Mord/Totschlag Dietrich v. Quitzow‘s und Christoph v. Retzdorf‘s durch sechs Landsknechte (410-411).
Enthält auch: Inhaltsverzeichnis.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.