In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage des Hartman Rölever ./. den Landschaftssyndikus Lic. Henrich von Detten und den Hofgerichtsprokurator Gerhard Berning als Testamentsvollstrecker der Witwe Bildhauer Johan Reining, geb. Margarete Hülshorst an der Frauenstraße.
Klage des Hartman Rölever ./. den Landschaftssyndikus Lic. Henrich von Detten und den Hofgerichtsprokurator Gerhard Berning als Testamentsvollstrecker der Witwe Bildhauer Johan Reining, geb. Margarete Hülshorst an der Frauenstraße.
Enthält: Erwähnt werden Steinhauer Henrich zum Hülse an der Wennemarstegge in Überwasser; Steinhauer Johan Strassburg; Hw. Goddert Bolandt; Jakob zum Busche; Henrich Hülshorst; Martin Schnelle; Johan Flege; Johan Plugge; Berndt Lenters in Havixbeck; Johan Strick; Henrich Asbeck; Johan Jodefelt; Ewalt Wissman; Ludger Hoiering; Bernard Middendorp; Bernt Schwertfeger; Georg Raphöly; Johan Ahaus; Peter Delsen; Johan Gressbeck; Notar Johan Saligheit; Notar Johan Osterman; Johan Breidenbach in Osnabrück; + Christoff Hofflinger am Überwasserkirchhof; + Engelbert Schmale, Domkapitelssekretär; + Johan Berckenfeldt;+ Konrad Beschwordt, Kanonikus an St. Mauritz; + Johan Droste, Kanonikus daselbst; Georg Henrich und Bertel Travelman, canonici an St. Mauritz; + Bildhauer Bernard Rotman; + Lic. Jakob Voss, Dechant im alten Dom; Theodor von Ehlen, canonicus in Horstmar; + Henrich von Raesfeld, canonicus im alten Dom; Bernard von Detten und Frau Mette; Johan Beverfuhre, uff der Lip wohnend; + Joachim Körding; + Paul Schamps am Markt; Peter Bertenhoff; + Albert Bisping auf der Stiege am Lappenbrink; + Everhard Schencking und Frau Ida; Georg und Balthasar von Büren; Domvikar Henrich von Detten auf dem Honekamp; Ratsherr Johan von Schonebeck; Wessel Schlaghecke; Domvikar Herman Beckers; Dr. jur. Dietrich Eckrodt; Maurermeister Jost Aschendorpff; Schneider Johan Schmeding; Steinhauer Johan Schalckendorp; Bomsydenmaker (Bomensynmaker) Bernhard Trachter; Steinhauer Johan Blanckenfuhrt; Gertrud, Frau Johan Goeke; Notar Balthasar Morien; Frau Georg Reinhardts, geb. Klara Wilckens; Margarete Huesgens im Breul; Witwe Gert Koch im Ksp. Martini; Trine, Witwe Bernhard Kötter; Dutzemacher(?) Christoff Trupp auf dem Honekamp; Henrich Borger auf dem Honekamp; Elisabeth, Tochter des + Goldschmied Henrich Rölever auf Überwasserkirchhof; Elisabeth Tochter des + Johan thor Huff; Notar Melchior Mencke; Rotger Osnabrück; Notar Bernhard Witfelt; Niklas Rupe; Notar Herman Heerde; Notar Niklas Brockhoff; Kaspar Cloet; Büchsenlademacher Hans Goldtschlag; Johan Kelger; Berndt zu Broynck; M. Herman zum Broicke; Notar Fendrich Beversen; + Rotger Hülshorst an der Ägidistraße; Vaspard Isfording; Niklas der Achter; Jakob Haver; Notar Ludwig Rummel; Paul Brecker; Theodor Päine.
Archivale
Verweis: Fortsetzung des Prozesses Nr. 2463 (?)
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
