In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Regest: Die Schöffen Ryckwyn Verwer und Johann Paiphoff vidimieren folgende Urkunde: 1458 April 9 Gerit van Ossenbroick, Gerits Sohn, einigt sich mit seinem Bruder Daniel v. O.,Kanoniker zu Wissel, wegen ihres väterlichen Erbes um Kalkar herum. Verhandelt vor den Schöffen Joh. Peels und Derick van Wetten. Dann bekunden sie weiter, dass Johann ingen Grond und Johann van Aken, Laten Daniels v. Ossenbroick in dem Hof Ludichaven, bezeugt hätten, die Geschwister Gerit und Beel Haen, die an 3 Morgen Land im Gericht Altkalkar behandigt gewesen seien, hätten ihre Hände den Provisoren der Armen zu Kalkar übertragen, die als Träger der Behandigung den Elbert Gruenkens, Sohn v. Elbert, Heitken ingen Ruenhoff, Sohn von Henrick, und Ryckwyn Verwer, Sohn von Ryckwyn, benannt hätten. Siegler: Daniel und die Schöffen
Siegelkommentar: Siegel ab
Original Pergament
Urkunden
Datum: saterdach na s. Margrieten; Siehe auch: AHVN, Heft 64, Stadtarchiv zu Kalkar, Nummer 351
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
