In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Beilegung von Differenzen zwischen den Junkern Albrecht und Johann von Selbach genannt Lohe und diversen Kreditoren vor dem gräflichen Gericht wegen Begleichung von Schulden
Beilegung von Differenzen zwischen den Junkern Albrecht und Johann von Selbach genannt Lohe und diversen Kreditoren vor dem gräflichen Gericht wegen Begleichung von Schulden
Fürstentum Siegen, Landesarchiv - Akten >> 19. Angelegenheiten des Adels >> 19.9. Familien von Lohe, von Lohe-Selbach, von Schenk
1591-1621
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Klage des Thomas von der Leyen zu Obersetzen wegen rückständiger Schulden des Albrecht von Selbach genannt Lohe (1591-1592); Klage des Franz Scheube zu Almbach wegen rückständiger Schulden des Albrecht von Selbach genannt Lohe (1603-1603); Klage des Bürgers und Krämers Seyfriedt (Seibert) Strobandt zu Marburg über rückständige Schulden der Gebrüder Johann und Albrecht von Selbach genannt Lohe (1603-1605, 1613); Verzeichnis der Ausgaben für den Haushalt des Rittmeisters Albrecht von Selbach genannt Lohe 1611-1612; Klage des Heinrich Quadt zu Isengarten wegen rückständiger Schulden des Johann von Selbach genannt Lohe (1613-1614); Forderungen des ehemaligen Dieners Wilhelm Raab zu Lohe um Begleichung von Rechnungen durch Johann von Selbach genannt Lohe (1614-1615, 1620-1621). Korrespondenten u.a.: Albrecht von Selbach genannt Lohe, Thomas von der Leyen (Obersetzen), Hans Gessel (Ferndorf), Franz Scheube (Almbach), Ludwig Landgraf zu Hessen, Krämer Seyfriedt Strobandt (Marburg), Albert hain (Lohe), Johann von Selbach genannt Lohe, Heinrich Quadt von Isengarten, Heinrich Ludwig von Hatzfeld, Wilhelm Raab (Lohe).
95 Bl.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.