In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält: - Wahrung der zwischen Graf Adolf (I.) von Kleve und Bischof Otto (IV.) von Münster zu Isselburg geschlossenen Fehde-Beilegung (1410) - Vergleich der von Herzog Gerhard von Geldern und Herzog Adolf (I.) von Kleve wechselseitig erhobenen Vorwürfe wegen der Übergriffe der Herren van Roermond (Ruremund) und van Hoen (1443) - Verstärkung der nach Abzug des Ritters Kracht Steck in der Stadt Soest gebliebenen Ritter Konrad Steck und Clamor van dem Bussche (1447) - Wahrnehmung der Interessen des Herzogs Johann (I.) von Kleve durch den Grafen von Wartenberg bei dem vom Papst mit der Regelung der Nachfolge des Bischofs von Münster beauftragten Kardinal Peter von Schaumburg (1449) - Entschädigungsansprüche der Stadt Soest an den Erzbischof von Köln ("gebreck zedell") (1449) - Maßnahmen des Elbert und Johann van Alpen, des Kracht Steck, Robert Staill, Derick van der Liete, Arnt Schele und des Wennemar Haezekamp zur Einhaltung der zwischen Kleve und Münster vereinbarten Fehde-Beilegung (Sept. 1449) - Verhandlungen zwischen den klevischen Räten Heinrich Nienhuis, Elbert und Johann van Alpen, Johann van dem Loe und Thies van Eyll mit dem Kardinal Nikolaus von Cusa auf Anraten des Heinrich Raeskop, Propst von St. Marien zu Utrecht (Okt. 1449)
Sachakte
Isselburg
Geldern
Roermond
Steck, Kracht
Wartenberg
Münster
Schaumburg
Soest
Köln
Alpen
Alpen
Steck, Kracht
Liete
Münster
Kleve
Nienhuis, Heinrich
Eyll
Cusa
Raeskop, Heinrich
Utrecht
Bussche
Haezekamp, Wennemar
Hoen
Kleve
Kleve
Kleve
Münster
Loe
Schele, Arnt
Staill, Robert
Steck, Konrad
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.