In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Mandatum restitutorio und de non amplius inquietando sine clausula Auseinandersetzung um Bezahlung von Steuern
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 02. 1. Kläger B
09.11.1665-29.05.1667
Kläger: (2) Walter Block, kgl. schwedischer Oberfaktor zu Wismar
Beklagter: Bürgermeister und Rat zu Wismar
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Bekl.: Dr. Caspar Schwartzkopf (A), Dr. Ambrosius Petersen (P)
Fallbeschreibung: Bekl. haben Kl. Soldaten ins Haus gelegt, um die Zahlung der Türkensteuer zu erzwingen. Obwohl sich Kl. auf seinen Status als kgl. Faktor beruft, werden ihm 1,5t Seife im Wert von 22 Rtlr gepfändet, weshalb er um exemplarische Bestrafung von 500 Rtlr für den Rat bittet. Das Tribunal fordert den Rat am 11.11. zur Rückgabe der Seife und Prüfung des Falles auf. Am 17.11. erbitten Bekl. eine Kopie der Klage, um darauf antworten zu können, erhalten diese jedoch nicht, weshalb sie am 21.12.1665 restitutio in integrum ergreifen und auf der Herausgabe des gegnerischen Schriftsatzes bestehen. Am 03.05.1666 nimmt das Tribunal den Fall an, am 23.01.1667 vertröstet es Bekl., die am 21.01. um Prozeßbeschleunigung gebeten haben. Am 29.05.1667 erbitten Bekl. erneut Kopie des Schriftsatzes, eine Antwort des Tribunals ist nicht überliefert.
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Auszug aus dem Privileg der Stadt Wismar vom 05.08.1654 über Rechtsmittel gegen Ratsentscheidungen
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
