In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Enthält u.a.: Nr. 27a-k: Valent. Herwart's Traktätlein btr. 1618-1623; Nr. 28: Des Buchdrucker Wild heimelich gedruckt Traktätlein einzuschicken. 13. Dezember 1623; Nr. 29: Rescr. keinen theolog. Traktat zu drucken ohne Censur. 13. Oktober 1624; Nr. 30: Dedeken petit sibi cammunicari consilia. 22. November 1628; Nr. 31: Eberh. Wild's Druck von Fischers Kinderpostille. 5. März 1627; Nr. 32-32a: Metrophanes Christopulos. Mai/Juni 1627; Nr. 33: Zaemann Georg. Februar 1627; Nr. 34-34b: Biblisches Handbüchlein des Eberh. Wild. 13. Januar 1629; Nr. 35: Conr. Geisler soll (seine Gesangbüchlein) fürder auss ohne Censur drucken. 1630; Nr. 36: Schriften des Theod. Thumm btr. 1630; Nr. 37-37a: Jo. Conr. Goebel Cens. zweier Predigten. 1630; Nr. 38-38a: Jo. Korbers's Predigt über Gustav Adolfs Tod. 1633; Nr. 39: Leichenpredigt des Georg von Plieningen. Januar 1634; Nr. 40-40a: Deutsche Politik des Ms. Eckhardt. Mai/Juni 1634; Nr. 41: Tob. Wagner's (v. Esslingen) Traktätlein gegen Besold. 27. Juni 1640; Nr. 42: Jo. Val. Andreae Bericht das Buch des Melch. Nicolai gegen Forer betreffend. Oktober 1643; Nr. 43: Adolf Helt. 21. September 1654; Nr. 44-44a: Traktat des Dr. Grav über Daniel. 1658, 1659; Nr. 45: Berichte der Leipziger Fakultät. ut sermones funebres etc. communicentur August 1663; Nr. 46: Conring's herm. Bibelversion. 1666; Nr. 47: Über Nicolais Traktat contra Foreri charactores. Wölflin cf. No. 42. August 1666; Nr. 48-48a: Consilium an einen Prediger zu Lindau wegen zweier Predigten gegen das Papsttum. 1667; Nr. 49-49a: Predigt des Joh. Grafft. 1614; Nr. 50: Alb. Abholt (Schickhardi horolog contra Opiticum). 1675; Nr. 51: Fakultät lehnt eine Zensur ab. 1685; Nr. 52-52c: Kollneri disputatio de uprobato Synoretisme betr. (Landgraf v. Hess. Darmstadt Giessensis). 1686; Nr. 53: Consilium an Magister Leibnitz zu Esslingen puncto absolutionis impoenitenti datae. 1692; Nr. 54: Andreas Osiander's Communikantenbüchlein. 1693; Nr. 55: Befehl wegen Müllers Deces considorationum. Februar 1694; Nr. 56: Consilium über eine Predigt von Schröder begehrt. 1694; Nr. 56a: Pfaff differt. de Sacra Script. 1700; Nr. 57: Biblische Summarien. 1708; Nr. 57a: Biblische Summarien des Abt Zeller; Nr. 58: Philipp Müller in Jena des edith Concordienbuch betr. Dezember 1708; Nr. 59: Jo. Albr. Bengel, Nov. Testament quaer. 1730; Nr. 60-60a: Catechism. von Baireuth. 1733; Nr. 61: Jo. Conr. Maier Pf. zu Memmingen bittet um die Zensur einer apokalypt. Schrift. 1735; Nr. 62: Michaelis erläuterter Katechismus. 1763; Nr. 63: Paulitzky apokalypt. Zahl. 1703; Nr. 64-64z: Rustige Begriffe von dem einigen Gott anonym. 1761; Nr. 65-65a: Baiers Traktat (in Seefeld), Traktat über den Gebrauch der Taufe. 1780.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.