Acta und Nachrichten das vorher von Forstmeister danach von Schwalbach und endlich von Reifenbergische freiadlige Gut zu Albstadt bei Alzenau im Freigericht betreffend
Show full title
333, 1577
333 Herrschaft Reifenberg
Herrschaft Reifenberg >> 2 Akten >> 2.22 Zusätze
1588
Sachakte
Anzumerken: 1.) 1588: "protestat" und Klage bei dem Kammergericht protocollum iuris venandi zu Albstadt 2.) 1526: Eberhard und Lorenz von Schwalbach stellen an Frowin von Hutten eine Verschreibung über 800 Gulden aus und lösen dadurch zugleich 200 Gulden wieder ein, welche Martin von Forstmeister von Hans von Hutten auf den Hof zu Albstadt gelehnt. 3.) 1605: Den 5. März versetzt Heinrich von Reifenberg seinen freiadligen Hof zu Westerfeld an Karl Pfizner und dieser sucht bei Hanau und Mainz im Jahr 1613 Exekution auf den Hof zu Albstadt 4.) 1613: Klagen bei dem Kammergericht in Sachen von Reifenberg vs. Mainz und Hanau "cit." et mandati worin die Freiheit und Unmittelbarkeit des Hofs Albstadt behauptet wird. 5.) 1650: Versetzt Philipp Ludwig von Reifenberg an Clara von Löwenstein geborene Brendel von Homburg ihren freiadligen zur Ritterschaft steuerbaren Hof Albstadt. 6.) Verschiedene Spezifikationen und Anschläge von dem Hof Albstadt.
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Es gelten die Nutzungsbedingungen der Staatsarchive in Hessen.
17.06.2025, 2:07 PM CEST