In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage des Wilhelm Henrich Torck, später dessen Witwe, geb. Klara Theresia Giese, ./. Michael Storm (Sturm) wegen Benutzung eines Brunnens
Enthält: Klage des Perückenmachers Wilhelm Henrich Torck, später (1784) dessen Witwe, geb. Klara Theresia Giese, auf der Rothenburg gegen Michael Storm (Sturm), 1753 - 1786, wegen Benutzung eines Brunnens. Siehe auch Nr. III 034. Rechtsvorgänger des Klägers war der verstorbene Chirurgus Giese. Der Beklagte hat sein Haus (früher Deiterman, davor Karteman) unweit des Aegidiikirchhofs neben dem Hause des Notar Hartman 1753 in der Zwangsversteigerung Deiterman gekauft. Die Witwe des Beklagten wohnt 1754 auf der Pferdestegge; ihr Erbe, der Küster Goswin Schmitz auf dem Domhof tritt 1785 in den Prozess ein. Als Zeugen werden vernommen: Katharina Stadius, Witwe Sporenmacher Bertold Crone, 90 Jahre alt; Klara Elisabeth Focke, Witwe Schmied Deiterman, 34 Jahre alt; Sporenmacher Ahlbaum, 53 Jahre alt. Erwähnt werden Schreiner Nikolaus Busch; Dr. med. J. H. Wilberding; G. Lohkampf; die Prokuratoren Mauritz Karl Menz und Johan Karl Niedick; Türwärter J. B. Bokholt; Notar Friedrich Christian Meiteler; die Zimmerknechte Johan Ditrich Happe und Johan Herman Leifeld. Anlage: Ausfertigung folgenden Kaufbriefs: Am 3. 9. 1691 verkauft Jungfer Anna Barbara Dücker im Beistand des Dr. jur. Werner Dietrich Schelver dem fürst. münster. Hofspormacher [?] Albert Kathman ihr Haus auf der Rothenburg unweit Aegidiikirchhof; das Haus ist ihr bei der Teilung des Nachlasses ihres Vetters Spormacher Arndt Peters zugefallen. Zeugen: Goldschmied Christian Poppe aus Münster und Johan Holscher, Bürger in Osnabrück. Vertrag wird geschlossen in Osnabrück im Hause des Dr. Schelver. Notar: Albert Schütte in Münster.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
