In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Streit zwischen dem Herrn zu Tüschenbroich und dem ehemaligen Vogt und Rentmeister
Enthält: Nachdem der viele Jahre andauernde Streit zwischen (Junker) Rudolff v. Schonenbeck, Herr zu Tüschenbroich, und dem ehemaligen Vogt u. Rentmeister Dietrich Damen vor das Düsseldorfer fürstl. Hofgericht und dort der Prozeß noch immer nicht zur Hauptverhandlung gelangt ist trotz Appellation an die Kammer nach Speyer und nun nach dem Tode der ursprünglichen Kontrahenten sich auf Tüschenbroicher Seite Caspar v. Schonenheck und auf Damenscher Seite verschiedene Bürger und Erben gegenüberstehen, sind jetzt beide Parteien - Caspar v. Schonenheck und Johannes Hundius , fürstl. pfalz-neuburg. Hofprediger, und Johan v . Redinghoven, Dr. iur . , als Advokat in der Sache einerseits und Johann Hetterman, Gertrudt Damen Wwe. Goßen v. Grubusch und Johann Gackeis andererseits - gütlich übereingekommen, den Prozeß ein für allemal zu beenden, wobei die Damensehe Seite an v . Schonenheck 150 Reichstaler erlegen will. Unterschr. : v. Schonenbeck, Johan Hundius, ref. Hofprediger, v. Redinghoven, Peter Ganß, Notar.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
