Verzicht auf Rechte am Hof Breitenfeld
Show full title
Urk. 25, 11
Urk. 25 Kloster Hachborn - [ehemals: A II]
Kloster Hachborn - [ehemals: A II] >> 1201-1300
1247 Februar 8
(A) Ausf. Perg. S. 2) fehlt, 1) an roten Fäden besch. anh. 57 mm Dm. Reiters., Schild mit Andreas-kreuz, nach rechts, Schwert schwingend, Topfhelm m. Federbusch. U: + M o CONRADI o DE o MRC. (C) Abschr. K 231 fol. 18. Regest: StA. Mbg. 22a Gen. Nr. 1 fol. 53v.
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Acta apud Merenberch mense Novembris. Insuper apud Wetflariam wiederholt. A. d. 1247, 6. idus Februarii.
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Konrad und Widekind von Merenberg (Merenberch), Brüder, beurkunden, daß Baldemar, Riffried, Leinfried, Konrad, Giselbert, Irmgard, Hedwig und Pache auf Ersuchen der Meisterin Jutta und des Konvents von Hachborn (Havekeborne) auf ihre Rechte am Hof Breitenfeld (Breidevelt) verzichtet haben.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Ludwig von Salzböden (Salsbuode), Heinrich Martin, Heinrich von Atzbach (Adsbach), Damm von Buseck (Bukesecke), Ludwig von Elsoff. - Giselbert, Dekan des Stifts Wetzlar, Kraft von Rodenhausen (Rudenhusen). Eberwin von Garbenheim (Garvenheim), Wetzel von Garbenheim, Damar, Ritter
Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Ricolf und Ludwig, Schöffen zu Wetzlar.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Ludwig von Salzböden (Salsbuode), Heinrich Martin, Heinrich von Atzbach (Adsbach), Damm von Buseck (Bukesecke), Ludwig von Elsoff.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Druckangaben: Druck: Sponheimer, Wetzl. UB Bd. 2 Nr. 22 S. 12. Regest: Wenck, Hess. Landesgesch. Bd. 2 ÜB Nr. 135 S. 165, Görz, Mittelrhein. Reg. Teil 3 Nr. 598. Regest: Schunder Nr. 797
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Konrad und Widekind von Merenberg (Merenberch), Brüder, beurkunden, daß Baldemar, Riffried, Leinfried, Konrad, Giselbert, Irmgard, Hedwig und Pache auf Ersuchen der Meisterin Jutta und des Konvents von Hachborn (Havekeborne) auf ihre Rechte am Hof Breitenfeld (Breidevelt) verzichtet haben.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Ludwig von Salzböden (Salsbuode), Heinrich Martin, Heinrich von Atzbach (Adsbach), Damm von Buseck (Bukesecke), Ludwig von Elsoff. - Giselbert, Dekan des Stifts Wetzlar, Kraft von Rodenhausen (Rudenhusen). Eberwin von Garbenheim (Garvenheim), Wetzel von Garbenheim, Damar, Ritter
Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Ricolf und Ludwig, Schöffen zu Wetzlar.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Ludwig von Salzböden (Salsbuode), Heinrich Martin, Heinrich von Atzbach (Adsbach), Damm von Buseck (Bukesecke), Ludwig von Elsoff.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Druckangaben: Druck: Sponheimer, Wetzl. UB Bd. 2 Nr. 22 S. 12. Regest: Wenck, Hess. Landesgesch. Bd. 2 ÜB Nr. 135 S. 165, Görz, Mittelrhein. Reg. Teil 3 Nr. 598. Regest: Schunder Nr. 797
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
10.06.2025, 9:13 AM CEST
Hierarchy
Hierarchy detail view
- Hessisches Staatsarchiv Marburg (Archivtektonik)
- Gliederung (Archival tectonics)
- Urkunden (Archival tectonics)
- Hessen (Archival tectonics)
- Klöster, Korporationen, Institutionen u.a. (Archival tectonics)
- Klöster, Korporationen, Institutionen u.a.: Kloster Hachborn - [ehemals: A II] (Archival holding)
- 1201-1300 (Classification)