In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Klage Johan Schmedding ./. Henrich Berning bzw. dessen Sohn Dr. jur. Berning wegen eines Brunnens
Enthält: Klage des Bäckeramtsverwandten Johan Schmedding (vertreten durch Prokurator Kaspar Osnabrügk) ./. den Ratsherrn Henrich Berning, nach dessen Tod (1635) gegen dessen Sohn Dr. jur. Berning (vertreten durch Prokurator Konrad Hülsbusch). Streit wegen eines Brunnens, an dem Kläger und für sein Hinterhaus der Beklagte berechtigt sind. Der Beklagte nimmt ein Recht daran auch in Anspruch für ein Haus, das er ex discussione Mumme olim Albert Wulfferts angekauft hat. Kläger behauptet: Albert Wulfert habe auf das Recht an dem Brunnen zu Gunsten seiner Rechtsvorgänger Herman Weddepoel und Katharina Nüse verzichtet. Albert Wulffert war verheiratet mit Gertrud Bischoping. Das Haus des Beklagten stößt an Wassermans Haus. Am 13. 11. 1635 findet ein Scheffentag (Ortsbesichtigung) statt durch den Lic. Hinrich Timmerscheidt und die Scheffen Henrich Meinertz und Wilhelm Otterstedde. Erwähnt werden M. Melchior Haverkamp, M. Johan Gyse, Herman Plonies, Anton Brümmer und Herman Wischman.
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
CC0 1.0 Universal