In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Rechtsstreitsache Armenhaus Joddefelt contra Droste-Erbdroste
Enthält: Akten in Sachen des Armenhauses Joddefelt, vertreten durch den Emonitor und Vikar Johan Gerhard Neuhaus, später durch den Emonitor und Notar Bernard August Busch, gegen den Geh. Rat Maximilian Friedrich Freiherr Droste, Erbdroste zu Sarfeld.
Die Klage ist erhoben am geistlichen Hofgericht.
Verlangt werden rückständige Renten aufgrund einer Urkunde aus dem Jahre 1629, in der Johan Heidentrich von Vörden, Domherr in Münster und Osnabrück sich gegenüber seiner Base Ida von Vörden, Äbtissin zu Überwasser, verpflichtet hat, den Armen Jöddefeld jährlich 3 Reichstaler Rente zu zahlen. Gestützt wurde die Klage darauf, dass der Vater des Beklagten Christoph Heidentrich an Droste zu Vischering und Sarfeld die Rente in den Jahren 1674 bis 1718 bezahlt habe.
Erwähnt werden Johan Herman Wulweber, Ludger Feurscheid, die notare Johan Christoph Volckering und Johan Gerhard Kumpers, die Prokuratoren Bernard Josef Lobeck, Jobst Huger und Jobst Ferdinand Huger, die Kopisten Franz Pötter und Franz Nieden.
Die Klage wird abgewiesen. Kläger legt Revision ein.
gebundene Akte
Archivale
Verweis: Verzeichnis Josef Ketteler, S. 187
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
