In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Kurfürst Philipp von der Pfalz vergleicht eine Auseinandersetzung zwischen dem Domstift zu Worms und Wiegand von Dienheim wegen strittiger Gefälle...
Urkunden der ehemaligen Provinz Rheinhessen >> 13 Orte, Buchstabe O >> 13.10 Oppenheim
1490 Januar 21, Heidelberg
v. Dienheim ? / Kurpfalz ?
Ausfertigung (deutsch), Pergament (23,5 x 30,6-31 cm), rundes, rotes Wachssiegel, in brauner Siegelkapsel an Pergamentstreifen anhängend, erhalten
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Heidelberg vff donrstag nach sant Sebastianstag anno domini millesimo quadringentesimo nonagesimo
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Kurfürst Philipp von der Pfalz vergleicht eine Auseinandersetzung zwischen dem Domstift zu Worms und Wiegand von Dienheim wegen strittiger Gefälle von seinem pfälzischen Burglehen zu Oppenheim dahingehend, dass das Domstift jährlich dem von Dienheim das Fuder Wein zu Osthofen und die zwanzig Malter Korn zu Oppenheim geben soll, während die Forderung der 5 Unzen Heller für nichtig erklärt wird.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Rückvermerk: (1) Domhern zu worms wigand von dinheim (2) N 343 (3) Vertrag zwuschen weiganden von dienheim vnd thombstifft wormbs lehens geuelle halb. (4) 1490
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Aussteller
Vermerke (Urkunde): Deskriptoren: (1) Heidelberg (Baden-Württemberg) (2) Osthofen (Lkr. Alzey Worms, Rheinland-Pfalz) (3) Oppenheim (Rhein-Lahn-Kreis, Rheinland-Pfalz) (4)Worms (Rheinland-Pfalz) Personen: (1) Philipp der Aufrichtige, Kurfürst von der Pfalz, Pfalzgraf bei Rhein, Herzog in Bayern, Erztruchsess 2) Dienheim, Wiegand von Institutionen/Körperschaften: (1) Domdekan, Kapitel und Präsenz des Domstifts zu Worms (2) Abt von Hornbach
Vergleich
(1) Oppenheim Vertrag durch Pfalzgraf Friedrich[sic !] bei Rhein gemacht zwischen dem Domstift zu Worms und Wigand von Dienheim wegen strittiger Gefälle von seinem Burglehen zu Oppenheim D. Heidelberg [?] nach Sebastian 1490 No 130¼
#Kurpfalzurkunden
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.