In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Relationen des Obergerichts >> 01. Gesamte Archivalien
1749
Konkurssachen des Christian Hinrich Holtz. - Victor von Bars contra Franz Ludwig Barckey in pto debiti. - Johann Anton Behrens contra Johann Peter Dettger in pto Auseinandersetzung um Schadensersatz. - Hartwig Michael Both und Johann Adam Steffens contra Witwe von Ulrich Hinrichsen in pto Auseinandersetzung um Aufteilung eines Familienerbes. - Albrecht Gottfried Dreuse, namens seiner Stieftochter Anna Dorothea Lindtner, verehelichte Michelsen contra Johann Joachim Stroth & Johann Wilhelm Michelsen in pto Auseinandersetzung um den Wiederruf der Veräußerung und Hypothek. - Auseinandersetzung um den Konkurs von Niclas Escher. - Hans Hinrich Edler contra Oberstleutnant von Hagen in pto Auseinandersetzung um einen Kaufvertrag. - Johann Friedrich Fust und das Zimmerleuteamt contra Tischleramt in pto injuriarum. - Frau von N N Franck, Amtsverwalter, geb. Leschenkahl contra Peter Velthusen in pto debiti. - Ernst Ludwig Junge und dessen Ehefrau contra Ilsabe Marie Padderau, verehelichte Richter in pto Auseinandersetzung um versteckte und gestohlene Sachen. - Jochim Ludolph Kahl contra Brauerkompanie in Assistenz ihrer Kassebedienten in pto Auseinandersetzung um Injurien. - Herr von der Lühe zu Mulsow contra Christian Ludwig Hundt in pto debiti. - Johann Peter Leusmann contra Korporal N N Norberg bzw. der Procurator Civitatis in pto Auseinandersetzung um unrespektierliche Aufführung. - Amt der Müller contra Gewett in pto Auseinandersetzung um neue Verordnungen. - Johann Hinrich Reetz contra Johann Friedrich Rudolph und Johann August Bergmann Auseinandersetzung um verlangte Musik, jetzt die Bezahlung von Schulden. - Konkurssachen des Johann Rüge. - Gottfried Simon in Stettin contra Franz Ludwig Barckey und Jochim Ludolph Kahl in pto debiti. - Ein Meister des Schneideramtes contra Älteste und übrige Meister des Schneideramtes in pto Auseinandersetzung um den Verkauf des Schneiderkruges sowie Injurien. - Amt der Schuster contra Erich Nils Holm und die Ältesten des Altflickeramtes in pto Auseinandersetzung um das "besuchen". - Johann Philipp Treffner, Procurator Civitatis contra Caspar Schwartzkopf in pto Auseinandersetzung um eine Vermietung. - Acta die Gläubiger der Frau des Oberst von Vietinghoff betreffend. - Caspar Zander contra Amt der Tischler in pto Auseinandersetzung um eine weggenommene Treppe. - Caspar Griesebach conra Johann Hinrich Ladendorff in pto debiti. - Franz Kindt contra Hinrich Handt in pto debiti.
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International