Pachtnachlaßgesuche von Pächtern aus den Kantonen Elsen, Neersen, Neuss, Odenkirchen und Uerdingen aus der französischen Zeit Heft 27: Michael Wirtz, Hufschmied in Norf (1796) Jahr 11–12 (1802–1804) (ehem. Kloster Gnadental);

Show full title
/
 
Landesarchiv Nordrhein-Westfalen. Abteilung Rheinland
Data provider's object view
AA 0635, 1621 - I
Renteioberaufsicht Aachen Nr. 58
AA 0635 Generalgouvernement vom Nieder- und Mittelrhein (AA 0635)
Generalgouvernement vom Nieder- und Mittelrhein (AA 0635) >> 11. 11. Kreisdirektionen >> 11.14. 12.9. Domänenverpachtungen
1797–1805 (1817)
Enthaeltvermerke: Heft 1: Erben Driesen, Erbmühlenpächter in Krefeld (1769) Jahr 12 (1803–1804), 1806; Heft 2: Gerhard Eulenpesch, Pächter der Insel Mönchenwerth in Büderich Jahr 11–13 (1802– 1805); Heft 3: J.H. Bütgen, Pächter des Nixhofes in Neuss Jahr 11 (1802–1803); Heft 4: Andreas Kürten, Mühlenpächter in Erprath (Jahr 3–5) Jahr 8–10 (1799–1802); Heft 5: Minderjährige Odile Hecker in Grimlinghausen Jahr 9 (1800–1801); Heft 6: Sassen, Pächter des Bockingshöfgens in Kaarst (ehem. Cölestinerinnen, Düsseldorf) Jahr 7–8 (1798–1800); Heft 7: Theodor Wankum und Co., Pächter in Grimlinghausen Jahr 7–8 (1798–1800); Heft 8: Witwe Peter Nellen, Mühlenpächterin in Wickrath (1796) Jahr 8–9 (1799–1801); Heft 9: Ferdinand Pfeiffer und Theodor Stromenger, Pächter des Camphauserhofs im Kanton Odenkirchen (ehem. Domstift, Köln) (1791–1794) Jahr 8–9 (1799–1801); Heft 10: Schippers, Schloßverwalter in Rheydt Jahr 6 (1797–1798); Heft 11: Witwe Lörper, Pächterin des Dommershofs in Willich Jahr 7–8 (1798–1800); Heft 12: Peter Mickenschreiber in Liedberg Jahr 8 (1799–1800); Heft 13: Peter Bousch, Pächter des Schipperhofs in Kleinkempen Jahr 7–8 (1798–1800); Heft 14: Adam Kox und Wilhelm Hompesch, Parzellenpächter in Steinfort, Mairie Liedberg (ehem. Klarissen, Neuss) Jahr 13 (1804–1805); Heft 15: Arnold Borger, Pächter des Borgerhofs in Willich Jahr 7–13 (1798–1805); Heft 16: Adam Otten, ehem. kurkölnischer Kellner in Linn Jahr 6–7 (1797–1799); Heft 17: Breuer im Kanton Uerdingen Jahr 10 (1801–1802); Heft 18: Roberz, Mühlenpächter in Linn Jahr 14 (1805–1806); Heft 19: Balthasar Kirschkamp, Pächter des Kirschkampshofs in Rath bei Vennikel, Kanton Uerdingen (1669) Jahr 8–11 (1799–1803); Heft 20: 79 Geschädigte durch Hochwasser und Eisgang im Kanton Uerdingen Jahr 8 (1799– 1800); Heft 21: Wilhelm Heinrich Cames, Pächter des Meerhofs in Strümp Jahr 9–12 (1800–1804); Heft 22: Joh. Rubsteck in Neurath Jahr 11–12 (1802–1804); Heft 23: Franz Joseph Römer, Pächter des Münchrather Hofs Jahr 11–12 (1802–1804); Heft 24: Heinrich Statthalter in Barrenstein (ehem. Stift St. Gereon, Köln) (1735) Jahr 12–13 (1803–1805); Heft 25: Witwe Constanze Mandewirth, Pächterin des Neuhöfchens in Frimmersdorf (ehem. Kloster Kamp) (1557) Jahr 11–13 (1802–1805); Heft 26: Joh. Peter Kautz in Ramrath (ehem. Stift St. Maria im Kapitol, Köln) (1790, 1795) Jahr 11–13 (1802–1805);
Diverse Registraturbildner
27 Hefte;
Sachakte

BZK no.

The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.

This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.

Delict according to Nazi judicial system

Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).

Reason for persecution

The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.

Role in the proceeding

‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).

Search in Archivportal-D

You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.

Additional information on reason for persecution

Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Archive in NRW
LicenseAttribution - ShareAlike 4.0 International
Object in the 'Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek'
28.04.2026, 8:42 AM CEST
Landesarchiv Nordrhein-Westfalen. Abteilung Rheinland
Data provider's object view

Hierarchy

Hierarchy detail view

Landesarchiv Nordrhein-Westfalen