In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Gesuche verschiedener Zoll- und Akzise-Einnehmer um
Beibehaltung der Einnahme der neuen quartalsweise erhobenen
Konsumtions-Akzise
Enthält: - Gesuche folgender Einnehmer: Anthon Günther Matthiassen (Matthiessen) im Land Wursten vom Juli 1697 (mit abschlägigem Bescheid); Johann von Döhlen im Amt Bederkesa vom März 1697 (mit positivem Bescheid); Johann Kayser, Vogt in Lamstedt, vom März 1697 (mit positivem Bescheid); Hans Caspar Helmund in Hastedt im Gericht Achim vom Oktober 1697 (mit positivem Bescheid); Joachim Starck in Stotel vom Januar 1697 (mit positivem Bescheid); Johann Jacob Steinkopf in Ottersberg vom November 1697 (mit positivem Bescheid); Adolf Benedict Hahn im Land Kehdingen, Bützflethischer Teil, vom Mai 1698 (mit positivem Bescheid) - Streitsache des Kontributionseinnehmers Dietrich Niemann in Scheeßel gegen den dortigen Vogt Hinrich Grafe vom Februar/März 1697 wegen der Einnahme in Scheeßel (mit Bescheid für Grafe)
Verzeichnung
Konsumtionsakzise
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.