In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Anspruch auf Rechnungslegung und Abrechnung der Einnahmen der Kirche von Kelz, die Kettenbreuer als Pfleger verwaltet hatte.
Reichskammergericht, Teil V: I-L >> 2. Buchstabe K
1530 - 1536 (1528 - 1536)
Enthaeltvermerke: Kläger: Wilhelm von Bessenich, Vogt zu Kelz (Hzm. Jülich, Amt Nideggen; Kr. Düren), und Konsorten: Schultheiß, Schöffen und ganze Gemeinde für die Pfarrkirche zu Kelz, (Kl.) Beklagter: Wilhelm Keutenbreuer (Kettenbreuer), Kelz, (Bekl.) Prokuratoren (Kl.): Dr. Christopher Hoess 1530 - Dr. Hieronymus Hauser 1530 - Dr. Friedrich Rebstock 1530 Prokuratoren (Bekl.): Dr. Friedrich Reifsteck 1531 - Dr. Simon Engelhart 1531 - Dr. Leopold Dick 1531 - Lic. Nikolaus Bueb 1531 - Dr. Ludwig Ziegler 1534 - Lic. Mauritius Breunlin 1534 - Dr. Philipp Baumann 1534 - Lic. Nikolaus Bob (statt Bueb) 1534 - Lic. Andreas Weiß 1534 Prozeßart: Appellationsprozeß Instanzen: 1. Hauptgericht Jülich 1528 - 2. RKG 1530 - 1536 (1528 - 1536) Beweismittel: Urteile der Vorinstanz (48 - 51). Beschreibung: 2 cm, 67 Bl., lose; Q 1 - 13. Der Prozeß liegt unter K, weil Kläger und Beklagter auf dem Protokoll vertauscht wurden.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
