In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Untersuchung eines Tumults auf dem Fischmarkt im Jahr 1623
Enthält: Untersuchung eines Tumults in Münster, bei dem am 15. April 1623 (Osterabend) auf dem Fischmarkt 5 Kroaten von der Leibgarde des Feldmarschalls Anholt von Bürgern entwaffnet und verletzt wurden. Die Kroaten (Korporal Furditz, Matthias Marcoist, Janusz Schmelian, Peter Jewitz (?) und Lorenz Scheibeler) hatten ihre abgerittenen Pferde mit Bauerngäulen vertauscht (mit Gewalt). Am Ablauf beteiligt waren die Bürger Bernd Angsell, Schornsteinfeger, Jost Rost, Bernd Pagendarm, Jörgen Clute,Stephan Berve, Bäcker, sie werden auf Klage des Fiscus eidlich verhört. Erwähnt werden der Stadtkapitän Hans Gerhard v. Liskirchen und der Leutnant Adrian Stoerbrandt von den Ligatruppen. Dabei ein eigenhändiges Schreiben des FM Graf Anholt aus Ahlen 24. April 1623 sowie Schriftwechsel des Stadtsekretärs Henrich Hollandt mit dem Generalschultheiß Johan Itt. Die Kroaten erhalten 92 Taler Schmerzensgeld bzw. Schadensersatz. Erwähnt wird Beraubung des Edelmanns Joh. Torck zu Vorhelm zwischen Sendenhorst und Albersloh.
Archivale
Verweis: Siehe Regest von Nr. 104; vgl. Ratsarchiv, A XIV Nr. 79a.
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
