In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Simon von Schlitz und seine Frau Agnes verkaufen an Johann Pfeffersack, seinen Eidam Konrad und ihre Erben das Gut zu Mües, das Berlt Döring inneh...
Urkunden der Familie Riedesel v. Eisenbach >> 1303 - 1450
1358 Juli 19
Ausf., Pergament (19,8 x 26,5 cm) mit vier anhängenden Siegeln
Urkunde
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: quinta feria proxima ante festum beate Marie Magdalene
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Simon von Schlitz und seine Frau Agnes verkaufen an Johann Pfeffersack, seinen Eidam Konrad und ihre Erben das Gut zu Mües, das Berlt Döring innehatte, das halbe Gut zum Hain, das 24 Schilling Heller zinst, die halbe Sode zu Schlirf und das Schwein in der Mühle zu Heinbach, das wohl drei Pfund Heller wert ist, für 146 Pfund Heller an guten Turnosen auf Wiederkauf.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Zeugen: Bürgen: Heinrich von Schlitz, Heidolf Knauf und Henchen von Ruhlkirchen, die sich zum Einlager in Lauterbach verpflichten.
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: Siegelankündigung: "So bekenne ich Heinrich von Slicse by fundirn daz mich my(ne) Sustir Agnese umb erstin Ingesigel an diesin Brief hat gebetin auch die Ingesigele Hermans von der Auwe (...) 1. Siegel: Simon von Schlitz (d = 33 mm) 2. Siegel: Heinrich von Schlitz (Bürge für Agnes) 3. Siegel: Henchen von Ruhlkirchen (Bürge) 4. Siegel: Hermann von der Au (Bürge)
Regest: Becker, Urkundenbuch, Nr. 150
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution 4.0 International