In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Angelegenheiten von Einwohnern der Gemeinde Dreisbach (Dreispe)
Fürstentum Siegen, Landesarchiv - Akten >> 22. Siegensche Städte, Ämter, Flecken, Dorfgemeinden und Höfe ausschließlich der Stadt Siegen >> 22.3. D
1546-1597
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Bericht des Friedrich Brun an den Amtmann zu Siegen über Güter- und Eheangelegenheit des Adam Hoffmann zu Dreisbach (1546); Bericht des Rentmeisters Heiderich Heupel und Johann Dreuß zu Siegen an den Grafen Johann VI. zu Nassau-Dillenburg über eine Supplik der Gemeinde Dreisbach wegen der zu leistenden Dienste (09.08.1567); Bericht des Lenhardt Müller zu Dreisbach an den Siegener Amtmann wegen Nachlassung von Abgaben (11.03.1569); Bericht des Pastors Georg Weigel zu Siegen über einen getroffenen Vergleich zwischen dem Sohn des verstorbenen Kirchenmeisters zu Dreisbach und Franz Nausse zu Dreisbach wegen rückständiger Rezessschulden (30.08.1574); Supplik der Gemeinde Dreisbach wegen zu leistender Dienste auf dem Hof Füsselbach im Haingericht (16.03.1578); Supplik des Jorg Kresperg an den Siegener Amtmann wegen bestehender Differenzen mit dem Wirt zu Dreisbach (03.02.1586); Supplik der Gemeinde Dreisbach wegen zu leistender Dienste auf dem schloss zu Siegen (1567); Verfügung der Kanzlei zu Dillenburg wegen der Schweinemast zu Dreisbach (28.10.1597). Korrespondenten u.a.: Friedrich Brun, Rentmeister Heiderich Heupel (Siegen), Johann Dreuß (Siegen), Lenhardt Müller (Dreisbach), Pastor Georg Weigel (Siegen), Andreas Ramingius, Johann Geyse, Martinus Dentatus, Jorg Kresperg, Johann Braunfels (Netphen), Schultheiß Johann Greb (Siegen).
12 Bl.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.