In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Supplicationis Auseinandersetzung um Aufteilung eines Erbes
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 18. 1. Kläger R
(1764-1777) 21.10.1777-29.10.1777
Kläger: (2) Dr. Johann Richelmann in Rostock, Syndikus des Klosters Ribnitz, als Bevollmächtigter der Erben des Nicolaus Jörs, Trabant am Tribunal
Beklagter: Miterben des Nicolaus Jörs
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Johann David Lembke (A & P)
Fallbeschreibung: Kl. meldet die Ansprüche seiner Mandanten an dem Erbe des Nicolaus Jörs an, belegt diese, indem er die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse des Verstorbenen darlegt und bittet um Zustellung des Inventars über das Erbe und aller zugehörigen Schriften. Das Tribunal verweist Kl. am 29.10.1777 an die Exekutoren des Testaments.
Instanzenzug: 1. Tribunal 1777
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Auftrag des Viertelbauern und Klosteruntertans Hans Jörs in Willershagen an Kl. zur Beobachtung seiner Gerechtsame bei eventuellem Tod der Katharina Jörs vom 06.06.1764; Abstammungszeugnis des Pastors von Blanckenhagen für Hans Jörs, Einlieger in Volkshagen, vom 20.07.1777; von Johann Andreas Bunze, Küchmeister von Ribnitz, ausgestellte Nachricht über den Tod des Claus Jürs zu Willershagen vom 20.09.1777; vom Actuarius jud. Johann Andreas Bunge aufgenommene Zeugenbefragung von Hinrich Harder, Peter Wullenbecker und Claus Wiencke, Bauern aus Willershagen zu den Familienverhältnissen Jörs vom 20.09.1777, Darstellung der Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse des Hans Jörs vom Pastor zu Blanckenhagen, Johann Clapobus, vom 19.09.1777, Stammbaum Jürs, vom Rostocker Notar Friedrich Ludwig Dresen aufgenommene Benennung der Erben des Nicolaus Jörs vom 22.09.1777; Vollmacht der Erben für Richelmann vom 20.09.1777
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
