In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Appellationis Auseinandersetzung um Aufnahme ins Amt
Abt. IV. Rep. 1. B Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803
Prozeßakten des Tribunals 1653-1803 >> 19. 1. Kläger S
(1784-1785) 14.03.1785-16.04.1785
Kläger: (2) Älteste und gesamte Kompanie der Schiffszimmerleute (Bekl. in 1. Instanz)
Beklagter: Andreas Christensen Begge, Schiffszimmergeselle und Bürger Wismars (Kl. in 1. Instanz)
Anwälte, Prokuratoren: Kl.: Dr. Friedrich Nürenberg (A & P) Bekl.: Dr. Christoph Christian Hasse (A & P)
Fallbeschreibung: Nach Bitte des Bekl. um Verkürzung der Frist für die Kl. zum Einreichen ihrer Appellation werden diese vom Tribunal am 16.03. aufgefordert, ihren Schriftsatz binnen 3 Wochen vorzulegen. Am 29.03. bittet der Bekl. darum, die Kl. zur Übernahme der Prozeßkosten zu verurteilen, wird aber am 16.04. abgewiesen. Am 30.03. tragen die Kl. ihre Beschwerden gegen ein Ratsgerichtsurteil vor, das ihnen bei Androhung von 10 Rtlr Strafzahlung auferlegt, den Bekl. in ihre Kompanie aufzunehmen. Da dieser weder einen beglaubigten Lehrbrief noch Zeugnisse seines Lebenswandels vorweisen kann, lehnen die Kl. die Aufnahme gemäß ihrer Amtsrolle ab und suchen zunächst restitutio in integrum vor dem Ratsgericht und appellieren danach an das Tribunal mit der Bitte, den Bekl. nicht in ihr Amt aufnehmen zu müssen. Das Tribunal lehnt den Antrag am 16.04.1785 ab
Prozessbeilagen: (7) Ratsgerichtsurteil vom 08.03.1785; Lehrbescheinigung des Kopenhagener Schiffsbaumeisters Erich Eskildsen für Bekl. vom 14.07.1784; Protokoll des Ratsgerichts vom 25.08.1784; von Notar Friedrich Christoph Gustav Lehmann aufgenommene Appellation vom 09.03.1785
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
