In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Pastor Fabricius zu Richtenberg contra Cornel Niemann zu Wolfshagen Advocat Fisci vontra den Grafen Georg Friedrich von Küssow. - Der Schiffer Christoph Lossert contra den Bürger und Brauer Adam Waage. - Die verwittwete von Friedensberg contra den Provisoren der St. Marien Kirche. - Der königliche Kammerherr Baron von Schoultz contra den Pastoren von Glevitz. - Vormünder der Medewaldschen Kinder contra Academie zu Greifswald. - Capitain Woitke contra den Gemeinen Anwalt Wilhelm und Hoppenrathe. - Gemeiner Anwald der Almbergschen Creditoren contra Wittwe Meincken. - Landrath von Thun contra Behr. - Der königliche Hofrath und Procuratoris Domanuum von Santzen contra den Gemeinen Anwald der Rusboldschen Creditoren. - Des Gemeinen Anwald Reyherschen Concours contra dem Procuratorium Domanirum. - Der Hauptmann von Gentzkow zu Rossow contra den Syndicum Hauschildt mandatorium beim Ihlenfeldschen Concours. - Die Pommerschen Landstände von Ritterschaft und Städten contra die königliche Landesregierung. - Der Landsyndicus Hafelberg contra den Inspector Hermann zu Damgarten. - Die Convetualin des St. Johannis Kloster in Schleswig, Elisabeth von Krackewitz contra Rector und Consil der Academie Greifswald. - Der Pächter zu Kessin und Radelow Michaelsen contra der Academie zu Greifswald. - Der Bürger Hildebrand in Barth contra den Kaufmann Wallis zu Barth. - Der Provisor der St. Jacobs Kirche zu Stralsund contra den Eigentümer Wilmer auf Coldewitz. - Die von Liebeherrschen Geschwister contra den Gemeinen Anwald vom Liebeherrschen Concours. - Hamburger Kaufmann Clas Friedrich Hagel contra den Hamburger Kaufmann Johann Christoph Meyer und Seidenhändler Simonis. - Esther Flecken contra Jürgen Mück. - Langenhanshagener Bauer Jochim Schmidt, Johann Hinrich Runge und Hinrich Lorenz contra von Vegesack. - Erben des Altermannes Friedrich Stieveleben contra Bürgermeister und Rath der Stadt Stralsund. - Hofgerichtsassessor Lange contra Hofrath von Santen. - königlich Preußischer Major von Heyden contra die Erben des Regierungsrath Graf von Bohlen. - Winsheim aus Anklam contra Geminer Anwald vom Horn-Klotzowschen Concours. - Ginker Einwohner contra von Acken. - Ginker Einwohner contra Pfandträger Diecken. - Ginker Einwohner contra von Acken, den Pfandträger Diecken und dessen Wittwe. - Kauf- und Altermann Musche contra Amtmann Brunsten. - Die Wittwe des Landmarschall von Dechow contra den Gemeinen Anwalt des Dechowschen Concours
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International