In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Eckhard (Eghard) von Gelnhausen, Schultheiß von Fulda, und die
Schöffen in Fulda bekunden, dass Heinrich Dyttmars Kinder in Kranlucken
und Ehefrau...
Identifikation (Urkunde): Originaldatierung: Datum anno Domini M° CCCCXXVIII° uff dy Mittewochen nach sent Gallen tag
Vermerke (Urkunde): (Voll-) Regest: Eckhard (Eghard) von Gelnhausen, Schultheiß von Fulda, und die Schöffen in Fulda bekunden, dass Heinrich Dyttmars Kinder in Kranlucken und Ehefrau und Erben des Konrad Brückener (Cord Brügkener) den nächsten Anspruch auf ein Gut in (Gesseldorff) [Gösseldorf?] haben. Dazu berufen sie sich auf eine im Folgenden inserierte Urkunde von Friedrich (Friczsche) (Slyczberg) [Schlitz ?] und Konrad Ritter. Siegelankündigung. Inserierte Urkunde von 1426 März 5: Friedrich (Slyczberg) und Konrad Ritter bekunden, dass in ihrer Gegenwart Konrad Heynebach, Johann Korsten und Heinrich Smyd unter Eid ausgesagt haben, dass Heinrich Dyttmars Kinder in Kranlucken und Ehefrau und Erben des Konrad Brückener den nächsten Anspruch auf ein Gut in (Gesseldorff) [Gösseldorf?] haben. Bisher hatte das Gut Heinrich Cloß inne. Ebenso haben Adelheid Heynebach bei ihrer Frauenehre (wipludsere), und Meiner [?] und Friedrich ausgesagt, dass Heinrich Cloß das Gut zu seinen Lebzeiten innehatte und es danach an die genannten Erben zurückgefallen ist. Siegelankündigung des Konrad Ritter; Friedrich (Slyczberg) bedient sich Konrads Siegel. (Datum anno Domini M° CCCC° vicesimo sexto feria tercia proxima post Dominicam qua cantatur Oculi). (siehe Abbildungen: Vorderseite, Rückseite)
Vermerke (Urkunde): Siegler: [Eckhard von Gelnhausen, Schultheiß von Fulda]
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.