In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Relationen des Obergerichts >> 01. Gesamte Archivalien
1826
Scharfrichter Gosebeck contra Tischler Amt in pto contraventionis. - Krämer Comp. Verwandten Pasternack nomine der Witwe Hanning geb. Voß cum curatore den Kaaufmann Kneser und der Ehefrau des Kaufmanns Schilles zu Doberan contra Bürgerworthalter Amtshaaken Mau sen. in pto Debiti ex fidejussione. - Kaufmann Rüter zu Stralsund contra Senator Cornelsen in pto wörtlicher und tätlicher Beleidigungen sowie Schaden Ersatz. - Schlachtermeister Heyden contra Amt der Gahrbräter in pto Räumung eines Scharrens. - Dr. Reimkasten in Schwerin contra Eigentümer Allwardt zu Kritzowburg in pto dimittendae hypothecae. - Concurssachen der Gläubiger des Hutmachers Carl David Lorentz contra gem. Anwalt der Lorentzschen Gläubiger, Advocat Walter. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen Curatel für den minorennen Iwan von Glöden. - Krämer Comp. Verwandten Westphal und Riemer Ältester Henkelmann contra Arbeitsmann Wolter in pto wörtlicher und tätlicher Beleidigung. - Oeconomen Reddelien zu St. Jacobshof contra Kornmäckler Detgens, Herrlich und Haupt in pto Eingriffs. - Tapezierer Fölker contra Sophia Senkpiel in pto Alimentengelder. - Kaufmann Georg Ludwig Köster in Hamburg contra Krämer Compagnie Verwandten Sandmann in pto Debiti liquidi. - Kaufmann und Weinhändler Burmeister als Eigentümer von Gröningshof contra löbl. Polizei Department in pto Versorgung der Gundlachschen Familie. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen des Hanningschen Debit Wesens. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen Tapezierer Völcker contra Senkpiel in pto Alimentengelder. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen des Schiffszimmermeisters Hammer contra die Schiffzimmer Compagnie in pto Gebrauchs der Compagnie Prahmen. - Handlungshaus Christian Rose & Sohn contra Pensionair Kruse zu Eikelberg in pto arresti. - Handlungshaus Gottlieb Küster & Sohn in Reval contra geh. Finanzrat Satow auf Prützen in pto Debiti. - Kaufmann Friedrich Bohr zu Frankfurt am Main contra Krämer Compagnie Verwandten M. F. Kielmann in pto Debiti. - Schenkwirt Saß contra Riemer Amt in pto Eingriffs. - Eigentümer Ziemsen von Kluß contra löbl. Stadtkämmerei in pto Spolii. - Witwe Schleuder zu Rostock contra Major von Wickede in pto Debiti. - Eigentümer Stoch auf Friedrichsdorf als Vormund der minorennen Tochter des verstorbenen Mühlenpächters Carl Ziemssen zu Neu Bukow contra Eigentümer Ernst Ziemssen auf Kluß in pto Zinsenrückstand von 408 Rthl. - Untersuchungssachen wider Knecht Friedrich Setgast zu Oevelgünne in pto Misshandlung des Johann Friedrich Allwardt. - Schiffsklarierer Martens contra Strohhutmacher Weinrebe in pto injuriarum realium. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen Köster contra Sandmann. - Handlungshaus George Feill & Comp. in Hamburg contra Krämer Comp. Verwandten M. E. Kielmann in pto Debiti. - Mahler Älteste Michaelsen contra Witwe Röhring in pto eines neuen Gebäudes modo Fortbauens. - Arbeitsmann Edler contra Fischer Zietz in pto emti penditi. - Denunciationssachen wider Dienstmädchen Dorothea Maria Elisabeth Boye in furti. - Liquidation im Ludwig Arendtschen Concursus. - Kleinschmied Zander contra Witwe Boldt cum curatore Notarius Willgeroth in pto Debiti. - Untersuchungssachen wider Ehefrau des Bootsmannes Biele, Anna Maria Biele geb. Stahnke in pto Verdacht der Hurenwirtschaft. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen Böst contra Bürgermeister Schmidt. - Schreiben an die Richter in Sachen einer Feuerbrunst in Viereggenhof
Akten
Information on confiscated assets
Additional information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person or organization that was persecuted under National Socialism. They could file a claim for compensation or restitution as part of the Wiedergutmachung policy. If the application was submitted by another person or organization than the persecutee (for example, their son or daughter), this other person or organization is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecutee is noted, if known. In the sources, the persecutee is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person or organization not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International