In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Rechtsstreit zwischen der Freien Reichsritterschaft in der Wetterau einerseits und den Fürsten zu Nassau-Dillenburg sowie den Grafen von Sayn andererseits wegen der Reichsunmittelbarkeit des Reichsadels
Rechtsstreit zwischen der Freien Reichsritterschaft in der Wetterau einerseits und den Fürsten zu Nassau-Dillenburg sowie den Grafen von Sayn andererseits wegen der Reichsunmittelbarkeit des Reichsadels
Freier Grund Sel- und Burbach >> 1. Nassau-Dillenburgische Regierung >> 1.2. Adel und adlige Güter
1665-1692
Enthaeltvermerke: Enthält u.a.: Rechtsstreit zwischen dem Adel im Grund Burbach (insbesondere Johann Engelbert von Selbach und Johann Gottfried von Steprodt) einerseits und den Fürsten zu Nassau und Grafen zu Sayn andererseits vor dem Reichshofrat wegen der Reichsunmittelbarkeit; Prozessunterlagen (Auszüge aus Reichshofratsprotokollen, Notariatsinstrumente, Abschriften kaiserlicher Mandate, Suppliken, Repliken, Dupliken und Remonstrationen), Korrespondenzen mit dem Herzog von Sachsen-Eisenach wegen der Inhaftierung seines Vasallen und Landsassen Ernst Karl von Selbach (1685); Notamina der gräflichen Kanzlei zu Hachenburg auf die ritterschaftliche Triplik (1688); Prokuraturmandat der Freien Reichsritterschaft zu Burg Friedberg für den Reichshofratsagenten Jobst Heinrich Koch Edler von Edersleben (10./20.03.1690). Korrespondenten u.a.: Franz Martin von Menßhengen (Wien), Neumann (Wien), Anton Reusch (Hachenburg), Hofmann (Hachenburg), Notar Johannes Helvicus Haas (Friedberg), Johann Georg I. Herzog von Sachsen-Eisenach, Anwalt Conrad Oswald Garby.
Sachakte
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.