In addition to the technically required cookies, our website also uses cookies for statistical evaluation. You can also use the website without these cookies. By clicking on "I agree" you agree that we may set cookies for analysis purposes. You can see and change your cookie settings here.
Urteile des Gewerbegerichts Dortmund-Land wegen Lohnforderungen
Landkreis Dortmund: Kreisausschuss (1887-1928) >> 08 Wirtschaft und Verkehr >> 08.01 Handel, Handwerk, Gewerbe und Industrie >> 08.01.02 Gewerbegericht
1922
Enthält: Lerner, Simon, Herne gegen die Joseph-Werke GmbH, Lütgendortmund vom 19.10.1922; Poliger, Fritz, Lütgendortmund gegen die Fa. Gebrüder Umbach, Gerthe vom 01.12.1922; Hülsmann, Hermann, Somborn gegen die Fa. Johest Werke GmbH vom 28.09.1922; Schönhoffs, Friedrich, Dortmund gegen den Tiefbauunternehmer Gustav Sander, Horstmar vom 18.05.1922; Roos, Johann, Dortmund gegen den Bäckermeister Hühnerlage, Marten vom 01.12.1922; Noll, H. und Gen., Flecken / Werder gegen den Ziegeleibesitzer Korte, Marten vom 19.10.1922; Bitterling, Emilie, Dortmund gegen den Fotografen Karl August Meyer, Derne-Hostedde vom 27.04.1922; Peters, Heinrich, Lünen gegen das Baugeschäft Knorr, Derne vom 01.12.1922; Schulte, Friedrich, Lünen gegen die Fa. Hammann, Lünen vom 07.08.1922; Dimmerling, Josef, Dortmund gegen die Bauindustrie AG, Düsseldorf vom 17.08.1922; Riehner, Heinrich, Dorstfeld gegen den Bauunternehmer Michael, Marten vom 17.08.1922; Stüwe, Franz, Marten gegen das Baugeschäft Miebach, Marten vom 14.12.1922; Burchardt, Josef, Dortmund gegen die Fa. Gebrüder Hörster, Elberfeld vom 20.07.1922; Weißenberg, Wilhelm, Lünen gegen die Fa. Hammann, Lünen vom 17.08.1922; Jesch, Paul, Lünen gegen die Fa. Hammann, Lünen vom 17.08.1922; Veit, Fritz, Dortmund gegen die Fa. Knorr, Derne vom 12.01.1922; Bamberg, Lorenz, Dortmund gegen die Fa. Knorr, Derne vom 29.06.1922; Berdi, Heinrich, Altenderne-Oberbecker gegen die Harpener Bergbau AG vom 30.03.1922; Stüwe, Max, Hübinger, Jakob und Rücke, Walter, Marten gegen die Bauproduktions-Genossenschaft vom 17.08.1922; Hoppe, Fritz gegen die Gemeinde Lütgendortmund vom 07.12.1922
Archivale
Information on confiscated assets
Further information
BZK no.
The Bundeszentralkartei (BZK) is the central register of the federal government and federal states for completed compensation proceedings. When a claim is entered into the BZK, a number is assigned for unique identification. This BZK number refers to a compensation claim, not to a person. If a person has made several claims (e.g. for themselves and for relatives), each claim generally has its own BZK number. Often, the file number of the respective compensation authority is used as the BZK number.
This number is important for making an inquiry to the relevant archive.
Delict according to Nazi judicial system
Conduct that was first criminalized under National Socialism (e.g. the Treachery Act, ‘Judenbegünstigung’) or which the Nazi judiciary prosecuted more severely (e.g. high treason).
Reason for persecution
The reasons provided here are based on the wording in the reasons for persecution stated in the sources.
Role in the proceeding
‘Verfolgt’ refers to a person who submitted a compensation claim for damage caused by Nazi persecution. If the application was submitted by a person other than the persecuted person, this other person is designated as ‘antragstellend’ and their relationship to the persecuted person, if there is one, is noted. In the sources, the persecuted person is sometimes referred to as ‘Geschädigter’ (aggrieved party) and the applicant as ‘Anspruchsberechtigter’(claimant).
Search in Archivportal-D
You may find additional archival material on this person not related to Wiedergutmachung in the Archivportal-D.
Additional information on reason for persecution
Additional or more specific information on membership and group affiliation which were the reason for the persecution.
